Skip to main content

Relational Learning Using Constrained Confidence-Rated Boosting

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Inductive Logic Programming (ILP 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2157))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Abstract. In propositional learning, boosting has been a very popular technique for increasing the accuracy of classification learners. In first-order learning, on the other hand, surprisingly little attention has been paid to boosting, perhaps due to the fact that simple forms of boosting lead to loss of comprehensibility and are too slow when used with standard ILP learners. In this paper, we show how both concerns can be addressed by using a recently proposed technique of constrained confidencerated boosting and a fast weak ILP learner. We give a detailed description of our algorithm and show on two standard benchmark problems that indeed such a weak learner can be boosted to perform comparably to state-of-the-art ILP systems while maintaining acceptable comprehensibility and obtaining short run-times.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. C. Anglano, A. Giordana, G. Lo Bello, and L. Saitta. An experimental evaluation of coevolutive concept learning. In J. Shavlik, editor, Proceedings of the 15th ICML, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. Cohen and Y. Singer. A Simple, Fast, and Effective Rule Learner. Proc. of 16th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Karalic. First Order Regression. PhD thesis, University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Computer Science, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R.D. King, S. Muggleton, R.A. Lewis, and M.J.E. Sternberg. Drug design by machine learning: The use of inductive logic programming to model the structure activity relationships of trimethoprim analogues binding to dihydrofolate reductase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 89(23):11322–11326, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. R.D. King, A. Srinivasan, and M. Sternberg. Relating chemical activity to structure: An examination of ILP successes. New Generation Computing, Special issue on Inductive Logic Programming 13(3–4):411–434, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Muggleton. Inverse Entailment and Progol. New Generation Computing, 13:245–286, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J.R. Quinlan. Bagging, boosting, and C4.5. In Proc. of 14th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.R. Quinlan. Boosting First-Order Learning. Algorithmic Learning Theory, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.R. Quinlan and R. M. Cameron-Jones. FOIL: A Midterm Report. In P. Brazdil, editor, Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Machine Learning, volume 667, pages 3–20. Springer-Verlag, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R.E. Schapire. Theoretical views of boosting and applications. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Algorithmic Learning Theory, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Sebag and C. Rouveirol. Resource-bounded Relational Reasoning: Induction and Deduction through Stochastic Matching. Machine Learning, 38:41–62, 2000.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Srinivasan, S. Muggleton, and R. King. Comparing the use of background knowledge by inductive logic programming systems. Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Inductive Logic Programming, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Srinivasan, S. Muggleton, M.J.E. Sternberg, and R.D. King. Theories for mutagenicity: A study in first-order and feature-based induction. Artificial Intelligence, 85:277–299, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. S. Wrobel. An algorithm for multi-relational discovery of subgroups. In J. Komrowski and J. Zytkow, editors, Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery: First European Symposium-Proceedings of the PKDD-97, pages 78–87, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hoche, S., Wrobel, S. (2001). Relational Learning Using Constrained Confidence-Rated Boosting. In: Rouveirol, C., Sebag, M. (eds) Inductive Logic Programming. ILP 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2157. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44797-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44797-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42538-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44797-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics