Skip to main content

Well-Founded Recursive Relations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Science Logic (CSL 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2142))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We give a short constructive proof of the fact that certain binary relations > are well-founded, given a lifting ≫ á la Ferreira-Zantema and a well-founded relation>. This construction generalizes several variants of the recursive path ordering on terms and of the Knuth-Bendix ordering. It also applies to other domains, of graphs, of infinite terms, of word and tree automata notably. We then extend this construction further; the resulting family of well-founded relations generalizes Jouannaud and Rubio’s higher-order recursive path orderings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. B. Barras, S. Boutin, C. Cornes, J. Courant, Y. Coscoy, D. Delahaye, D. de Rauglaudre, J.-C. Filliâtre, E. Giménez, H. Herbelin, G. Huet, H. Laulhère, C. Muñoz, C. Murthy, C. Parent-Vigouroux, P. Loiseleur, C. Paulin-Mohring, A. Saïbi, and B. Werner. The Coq proof assistant-reference manual. Available at http://coq.inria.fr/doc/main.html., Dec. 1999. Version 6.3.1.

  2. P. Cousot. Semantic foundations of program analysis. In S. Muchnick and N. Jones, editors, Program Flow Analysis: Theory and Applications, chapter 10, pages 303–342. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. Dershowitz. Orderings for term rewriting systems. Theoretical Computer Science, 17(3):279–301, 1982.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. N. Dershowitz. Termination of rewriting. Journal of Symbolic Computation, 3:69–116, 1987.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. N. Dershowitz and C. Hoot. Topics in termination. In C. Kirchner, editor, 5th RTA, pages 198–212. Springer Verlag LNCS 690, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Dowek and B. Werner. Proof normalization modulo. Research Report RR-3542, INRIA, Nov. 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Fernández and J.-P. Jouannaud. Modular termination of term rewriting systems revisited. In E. Astesiano, G. Reggio, and A. Tarlecki, editors, Recent Trends in Data Type Specification. Springer-Verlag LNCS 906, 906.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. M. C. F. Ferreira and H. Zantema. Well-foundedness of term orderings. In N. Dershowitz, editor, 4th International Workshop on Conditional Term Rewriting Systems (CTRS’94), pages 106–123. Springer Verlag LNCS 968, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. Gécseg and M. Steinby. Tree languages. In G. Rozenberg and A. Salomaa, editors, Handbook of Formal Languages, volume 3, chapter 1, pages 1–68. Springer-Verlag, 1997. Beyond Words.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J.-Y. Girard, Y. Lafont, and P. Taylor. Proofs and Types, volume 7 of Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science. Cambridge University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Goubault-Larrecq. A method for automatic cryptographic protocol verification (extended abstract). In FMPPTA’2000, pages 977–984. Springer Verlag LNCS 1800, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. Herbelin, Dec. 1996. Private communication.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J.-P. Jouannaud and A. Rubio. The higher-order recursive path ordering. In G. Longo, editor, 14th LICS, pages 402–411, Trento, Italy, July 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J.-P. Jouannaud and A. Rubio. Higher-order recursive path orderings á la carte. Draft available at ftp://ftp.lri.fr/LRI/articles/jouannaud/horpo-full.ps.gz, 2001.

  15. S. Kamin and J.-J. Lévy. Two generalizations of the recursive path ordering. Technical report, University of Illinois, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  16. P.-A. Melliès. On a duality between Kruskal and Dershowitz theorems. In 25th ICALP, pages 518–529. Springer Verlag LNCS 1443, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  17. D. Monniaux. Abstracting cryptographic protocols with tree automata. In 6th International Static Analysis Symposium (SAS’99). Springer-Verlag LNCS 1694, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. Thomassen. Embeddings and minors. In R. Graham, M. Grötschel, and L. Lovász, editors, Handbook of Combinatorics, chapter 5. Elsevier Science B.V., 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Goubault-Larrecq, J. (2001). Well-Founded Recursive Relations. In: Fribourg, L. (eds) Computer Science Logic. CSL 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2142. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44802-0_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44802-0_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42554-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44802-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics