Skip to main content

Answer Formulation for Question-Answering

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Artificial Intelligence (Canadian AI 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2671))

Abstract

In this paper, we describe our experimentations in evaluating answer formulation for question-answering (QA) systems. In the context of QA, answer formulation can serve two purposes: improving answer extraction or improving human-computer interaction (HCI). Each purpose has di.erent precision/recall requirements. We present our experiments for both purposes and argue that formulations of better grammatical quality are beneficial for both answer extraction and HCI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. E. Agichtein and L. Gravano. Snowball: Extracting relations from large plain-text collections. In Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on Digital Libraries, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Brill, S. Dumais, and M. Banko. An Analysis of the AskMSR Question-Answering System. In Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-2002), Philadelphia, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Brill, J. Lin, M. Banko, S. Dumais, and A. Ng. Data-Intensive Question Answering.In Proceedings of The Tenth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-X), pages 393–400, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Burger, C. Cardie, V. Chaudhri, R. Gaizauskas, S. Harabagiu, D. Israel, C. Jacquemin, C-Y Lin, S. Maiorano, G. Miller, D. Moldovan, B. Ogden, J. Prager, E. Rilo., A. Singhal, R. Shrihari, T. Strzalkowski, E. Voorhees, and R. eischedel. Issues, Tasks and Program Structures to Roadmap Research in Question & Answering (Q&A). Technical report, 2001. http://www-nlpir.nist.gov/projects/duc/roadmapping.html.

  5. C.L.A. Clarke, G.V. Cormack, T.R Lynam, C.M. Li, and G.L. McLearn. Web Reinforced Question Answering (MultiText Experiments for TREC 2001). In Proceedings of The Tenth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-X), pages 673–679, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Harabagiu, D. Moldovan, M. Pasca, R. Mihalcea, M. Surdeanu, R. Bunescu, R. Girju, V. Rus, and P. Morarescu. The role of lexico-semantic feedbacks in open-domain textual question answering. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-2001), pages 274–281,Toulouse, France, July 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Hovy, U. Hermjakob, and C.-Y. Lin. The Use of External Knowledge in Factoid QA. In Proceedings of The Tenth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-X), pages 166–174, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Lawrence and C. L. Giles. Context and page analysis for improved web search. IEEE Internet Computing, 2(4):38–46, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. T. Lynam, C. Clarke, and G. Cormack.Information extraction with term frequencies. In Proceedings of HLT 2001-First International Conference on Human Language Technology Research, pages 169–172, San Diego, California, March 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  10. L. Plamondon and L. Kosseim. Quantum: A function-based question answering system. In R. Cohen and B. Spencer, editors, Proceedings of The Fifteenth Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AI’ 2002) — Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence No. 2338, pages 281–292, Calgary, May 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. Reiter and R. Dale. Building Natural Language Generation Systems. Cambridge University Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. E.M. Voorhees and D.K. Harman, editors. Proceedings of The Eight Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-8), Gaithersburg, Maryland, November 1999. NIST. available at http://trec.nist.gov/pubs/trec8/t8_proceedings.html.

  13. E. M. Voorhees and D.K. Harman, editors. Proceedings of The Ninth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-9), Gaithersburg, Maryland, 2000. NIST. available at http://trec.nist.gov/pubs/trec9/t9_proceedings.html

  14. E. M. Voorhees and D.K. Harman, editors. Proceedings of The Tenth Text REtrievalConference (TREC-X), Gaithersburg, Maryland, November 2001. NIST. available at http://trec.nist.gov/pubs/trec10/t10_proceedings.html.

  15. E. M. Voorhees and D.K. Harman, editors. Proceedings of The Eleventh Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-11), Gaithersburg, Maryland, November 2002. NIST. to appear.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kosseim, L., Plamondon, L., Guillemette, L.J. (2003). Answer Formulation for Question-Answering. In: Xiang, Y., Chaib-draa, B. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Canadian AI 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2671. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44886-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44886-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40300-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-44886-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics