Abstract
Within psychology, at least two research communities study spatial cognition. One community studies systematic errors in spatial memory and judgement, accounting for them as a consequence of and clue to normal perceptual and cognitive processing. The other community studies navigation in real space, isolating the contributions of various sensory cues and sensorimotor systems to successful navigation. The former group emphasizes error, the latter, selective mechanisms, environmental or evolutionary, that produce fine-tuned correct responses.
How can these approaches be reconciled and integrated? First, by showing why errors are impervious to selective pressures. The schematization that leads to errors is a natural consequence of normal perceptual and cognitive processes; it is inherent to the construction of mental spaces and to using them to make judgments in limited capacity working memory. Selection can act on particular instances of errors, yet it is not clear that selection can act on the general mechanisms that produce them. Next, in the wild, there are a variety of correctives. Finally, closer examination of navigation in the wild shows systematic errors, for example, over-shooting in dead reckoning across species. Here, too, environments may provide correctives, specifically, landmarks. General cognitive mechanisms generate general solutions. The errors inevitably produced may be reduced by local specific sensori-motor couplings as well as local environmental cues. Navigation, and other behaviors as well, are a consequence of both.
I am grateful to Christian Freksa for heplful comments and encouragement and to two anonymous reviewers for critiques of an earlier version of this manuscript. Preperation of the manuscript was supported by Office of Naval Research, Grant Number NOOO14-PP-1-O649 and N000140110717 to Stanford University.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Human memory: Theory and practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Berthoz, A., Amorim, M-A., Glassauer, S., Grasso, R., Takei, Y., and Viaud-Delmon, I. (1999). Dissociation between distance and direction during locomotor navigation. In R. G. Golledge (Editor), Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes. Pp. 328–348. Baltimore: Hopkins.
Bryant, D. J. and Tversky, B. (1999). Mental representations of spatial relations from diagrams and models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25, 137–156.
Baird, J. (1979). Studies of the cognitive representation of spatial relations: I. Overview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 90–91.
Baird, J., Merril, A., & Tannenbaum, J. (1979). Studies of the cognitive representations of spatial relations: II. A familiar environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 92–98.
Bryant, D. J., Tversky, B., & Franklin, N. (1992). Internal and external spatial frameworks for representing described scene. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 74–98.
Bryant, D. J., Tversky, B., and Lanca, M. (2001). Retrieving spatial relations from observation and memory. In E. van der Zee and U. Nikanne (Editors), Conceptual structure and its interfaces with other modules of representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chase, W. G. & Chi, M. T. H. (1981). Cognitive skill: Implications for spatial skill in largescale environments. In J. H. Harvey (Ed.), Cognition, social behavior, and the environment. Pp. 111–136. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum.
Etienne, A. S., Maurer, R., Georgakopoulos, J., and Griffin, A. (1999). Dead reckoning (path integration), landmarks, and representation of space in a comparative perspective. In R. G. Golledge (Editor), Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes. Baltimore: Pp. 197–228. Johns Hopkins Press.
Franklin, N. and Tversky, B. (1990). Searching imagined environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 63–76.
Gallistel, C. R. (1989). Animal cognition: The representation of space, time and number. Annual Review of Psychology, 40, 155–189.
Gallistel, C. R. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Golledge, R. G. (Editor). (1999). Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial processes. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
Hirtle, S. C. and Jonides, J. (1985). Evidence of hierarchies in cognitive maps. Memory and Cognition, 13, 208–217.
Holyoak, K. J. and Mah, W. A. (1982). Cognitive reference points in judgments of symbolic magnitude. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 328–352.
Loomis, J.M., Klatzky, R. L, Golledge, R. G., and Philbeck, J. W. (1999) In R. G. Golledge (Editor). Wayfinding behavior: Cognitive mapping and other spatial properties. Pp. 125–151. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
Maki, R. H. (1981). Categorization and distance effects with spatial linear orders. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 15–32.
McNamara, T. P. and Diwadkar, V. A. (1997). Symmetry and asymmetry of human spatial memory. Cognitive Psychology, 34, 160–190.
Milgram, S. and Jodelet, D. (1976). Psychological maps of Paris. In H. Proshansky, W. Ittelson, and L. Rivlin (Eds.), Environmental Psychology (second edition). Pp. 104–124. N.Y.: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Newcombe, N. and Liben, L. (1982). Barrier effects in the cognitive maps of children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 34, 46–58.
Portugali, Y. (1993). Implicate relations: Society and space in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Poulton, E. C. (1989). Bias in quantifying judgements. Hillsdale, N. J.: Erlbaum Associates.
Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive reference point. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 532–547.
Sadalla, E. K., Burroughs, W. J., and Staplin, L. J. (1980). Reference points in spatial cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 516–528.
Sadalla, E. K. and Magel, S. G. (1980). The perception of traversed distance. Environment and Behavior, 12, 65–79.
Sadalla, E. K. and Staplin, L. J. (1980). The perception of traversed distance: Intersections. Environment and Behavior, 12 167–182.
Thorndyke, P. (1981) Distance estimation from cognitive maps. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 526–550.
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgement. Psychological Review, 90, 293–315.
Tversky, B. (1981). Distortions in memory for maps. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 407–433.
Tversky, B. (1992). Distortions in cognitive maps. Geoforum, 23, 131–138.
Tversky, B. (1993). Cognitive maps, cognitive collages, and spatial mental models. In A. U. Frank and I. Campari (Editors), Spatial information theory: A theoretical basis for GIS. Pp. 14–24. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Tversky, B. (2000a). Levels and structure of cognitive mapping. In R. Kitchin and S. M. Freundschuh (Editors). Cognitive mapping: Past, present and future. Pp. 24–43. London: Routledge.
Tversky, B. (2000b). Remembering spaces. In E. Tulving and F. I. M. Craik (Editors), Handbook of Memory. Pp. 363–378. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tversky, B. (2001). Spatial schemas in depictions. In M. Gattis (Editor), Spatial schemas and abstract thought. Pp. 79–111.Cambridge: MIT Press.
Tversky, B., Kim, J. and Cohen, A. (1999). Mental models of spatial relations and transformations from language. In C. Habel and G. Rickheit (Editors), Mental models in discourse processing and reasoning. Pp. 239–258. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Tversky, B., & Lee, P. U. (1998). How space structures language. In C. Freksa, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary approach to representation and processing of spatial knowledge (pp. 157–175). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Tversky, B., & Lee, P. U. (1999). Pictorial and verbal tools for conveying routes. In C., Freksa, & D. M., Mark, (Eds.), Spatial information theory: Cognitive and computational foundations of geographic information science (pp. 51–64). Berlin: Springer.
Wilton, R. N. (1979). Knowledge of spatial relations: The specification of information used in making inferences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 133–146.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tversky, B. (2003). Navigating by Mind and by Body. In: Freksa, C., Brauer, W., Habel, C., Wender, K.F. (eds) Spatial Cognition III. Spatial Cognition 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2685. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45004-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45004-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40430-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45004-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive