Abstract
Route directions are usually conveyed either by graphical means, i.e. by illustrating the route in a map or drawing a sketch-maps or, linguistically by giving spoken or written route instructions, or by combining both kinds of external representations. In most cases route directions are given in advance, i.e. prior to the actual traveling. But they may also be communicated quasisimultaneously to the movement along the route, for example, in the case of incar navigation systems. We dub this latter kind accompanying route directions. Accompanying route direction may be communicated in a dialogue, i.e. with hearer feedback, or, in a monologue, i.e. without hearer feedback. In this article we focus on accompanying route directions without hearer feedback. We start with theoretical considerations from spatial cognition research about the interaction between internal and external representations interconnecting linguistic aspects of verbal route directions with findings from cognitive psychology on route knowledge. In particular we are interested in whether speakers merge elementary route segments into higher order chunks in accompanying route directions. This process, which we identify as spatial chunking, is subsequently investigated in a case study. We have speakers produce accompanying route directions without hearer feedback on the basis of a route that is presented in a spatially veridical map. We vary presentation mode of the route: In the static mode the route in presented as a discrete line, in the dynamic mode, it is presented as a moving dot. Similarities across presentation modes suggest overall organization principles for route directions, which are both independent of the type of route direction—in advance versus accompanying—and of presentation mode—static versus dynamic. We conclude that spatial chunking is a robust and efficient conceptual process that is partly independent of preplanning.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agrawalla, M. (2001). Visualizing route maps. PhD thesis, Stanford University.
Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Augustine, M. & Coovert, M. (1991). Simulation and information order as influences in the development of mental models. SIGCHI Bulletin, 23, 33–35.
Barfield, W.L.R, Lim, R. & Rosenberg, C. (1990). Visual enhancements and the geometric field of view as factors in the design of three-dimensional perspective display. Proceedings of the Human factors society—34 th annual meeting. Orlando, Florida. (pp. 1470–1473). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
Barkowsky, T., & Freksa, C. (1997). Cognitive requirements on making and interpreting maps. In S. Hirtle & A. Frank (Eds.), Spatial information theory: A theoretical basis for GIS. (pp. 347–361). Berlin: Springer.
Berendt, B., Rauh, R., & Barkowsky, T. (1998). Spatial thinking with geographic maps: An empirical study. In H. Czap, P. Ohly, & S. Pribbenow (Eds.), Herausforderungen an die Wissensorganisation: Visualisierung, multimediale Dokumente, Internetstrukturen (pp. 63–73). Würzburg: ERGON-Verlag.
Bell, S. (1995). Cartographic presentation as an aid to spatial knowledge acquisition in unknown environments. M. A. Thesis. Geography Department, UC Santa Barbara.
Bogacz, S. & Trafton, G. (in press). Connecting internal and external representations: Spatial Transformations of Scientific Visualizations. Foundations of Science.
Bollmann, J. (1993). Geo-Informationssysteme und kartographische Informationsverarbeitung. In B. Hornetz & D. Zimmer (eds.), Beiträge zur Kultur-und Regionalgeographie. Festschrift für Ralph Jä tzold. (pp. 63–73). Trier: Universität Trier.
Buhl, H.M., Katz, S., Schweizer, K. & Herrmann, T. (2000). Einflüsse des Wissenserwerbs auf die Linearisierung beim Sprechen über räumliche Anordnungen. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 47, 17–33.
Casakin, H., Barkowsky, T., Klippel, A., & Freksa, C. (2000). Schematic maps as wayfinding aids. In C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, & K.F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial Cognition II — Integrating Abstract Theories, Empirical Studies, Formal Methods, and Practical Applications (pp. 54–71). Berlin: Springer.
Daniel, M.-P. & Denis, M. (1998). Spatial descriptions as navigational aids: A cognitive analysis of route directions. Kognitionswissenschaft, 7, 45–52.
Denis, M. (1997). The description of routes: A cognitive approach to the production of spatial discourse. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 16, 409–458.
Denis, M., Pazzaglia, F., Cornoldi, C. & Bertolo, L. (1999). Spatial discourse and navigation: An analysis of route directions in the city of Venice. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 145–174.
Eschenbach, C., Habel, C. & Kulik, L. (1999). Representing simple trajectories as oriented curves. In A. N. Kumar & I. Russell (eds.), FLAIRS-99. Proceedings of the 12 th International Florida AI Research Society Conference. (pp. 431–436). Orlando, Florida.
Freksa, C. (1999). Spatial aspects of task-specific wayfinding maps: A representation-specific perspective. In J. S. Gero & B. Tversky (eds.), Proceedings of visual and spatial reasoning in design. (pp. 15–32). University of Sydney: Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition.
Ghaëm, O., Mellet, E., Tzourio, N., Bricogne, S., Etard, O., Tirel, O., Beaudoin, V., Mazoyer, B., Berthoz, A., & Denis, M. (1998). Mental exploration of an environment learned from a map: A PET study. Fourth International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, Montréal, Canada, 7–12 juin 1998. NeuroImage, 7, 115.
Golledge, R.G. (1999). Human wayfinding and cognitive maps. In Golledge, R.G. (ed.), Wayfinding behavior. (pp. 5–45). John Hopkins University Press: Baltimore.
Golledge, R.G.; Dougherty, V. & Bell, S. (1995). Acquiring spatial knowledge: Survey versus route-based knowledge in unfamiliar environments. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1, 134–158.
Habel, C. (1988). Prozedurale Aspekte der Wegplanung und Wegbeschreibung. In H. Schnelle / G. Rickheit (Hrsg.): Sprache in Mensch und Computer (pp. 107–133). Westdeutscher Verlag: Opladen.
Habel, C. & Tappe, H. (1999). Processes of segmentation and linearization in describing events. In R. Klabunde & C. v. Stutterheim (eds.), Representations and processes in language production. (pp. 117–152). Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.
Hegarty, M. (1992). Mental animation: Inferring motion from static diagrams of mechanical systems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18(5), 1084–1102.
Herrmann, T., Schweizer, K., Janzen, G., & Katz, S. (1998). Routen-und Überblickswissen — konzeptuelle Überlegungen. Kognitionswissenschaft, 7, 145–159.
Herrmann, Th., Buhl, H.M. & Schweizer, K. (1995). Zur blickpunktbezogenen Wissensrepräsentation: Der Richtungseffekt. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 203, 1–23
Hunt, E., & Waller, D. (1999). Orientation and wayfinding: A review (ONR technical report N00014-96-0380). Arlington, VA: Office of Naval Research.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jones, S. & Scaife, M. (2000). Animated diagrams: An investigation into the cognitive effects of using animation to illustrate dynamic processes. In M. Anderson, P. Cheng & V. Haarslev (eds.): Theory and application of diagrams: First International Conference, Diagrams 2000, Edinburgh, Scotland (pp. 231–244). Berlin: Springer.
Kaiser, M., Proffitt, D., Whelan, S. and Hecht, H. (1992). Influence of animation on dynamical judgements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 669–690.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1980). Image and Mind. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard UP.
Levelt, W.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
Lovelace, K.L.; Hegarty, M. & Montello, D.R. (1999). Elements of good route directions in familiar and unfamiliar environments. In C. Freksa & D.M. Mark (eds), Spatial information theory. Cognitive and computational foundations of geographic information science. (pp. 65–82). Berlin: Springer.
Maaß, W. (1994). From visual perception to multimodal communication: Incremental route descriptions. AI Review Journal, 8, 159–174.
Maaß, W.; Baus, J. & Paul, J. (1995). Visual grounding of route descriptions in dynamic environments. In Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Computational Models for Integrating Language and Vision. MIT, Cambridge.
MacEachren, A.M. (1995). How maps work: Representation, visualization, and design. New York: The Guilford Press.
McNamara, T.; Hardy, J. K. & Hirtle, S. C. (1989). Subjective hierarchies in spatial memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15. 211–227
Morrison, J.B., Tversky, B., Betrancourt, M. (2000). Animation: Does it facilitate learning? In AAAI Workshop on Smart Graphics, Stanford, March 2000.
Newcombe, N. S. & Huttenlocher, J. (2000). Making space. Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press.
Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Presson, C.C. & Montello, D.R. (1988). Points of reference in spatial cognition: Stalking elusive landmarks. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6, 378–381.
Scaife, M. & Rogers, Y. (1996) External cognition: How do graphical representations work? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45, 185–213.
Schmidtke, H.R., Tschander, L., Eschenbach, C, Habel, C. (in print). Change of orientation, In E. van der Zee & J. Slack (eds.). Representing direction in language and space. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schumacher, S., Wender, K.F., & Rothkegel, R. (2000). Influences of context on memory of routes. In C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, & K.F. Wender (eds.), Spatial Cognition II-Integrating Abstract Theories, Empirical Studies, Formal Methods, and Practical Applications. (pp. 348–362). Berlin: Springer.
Steven, A. & Coupe, P., (1978). Distortion in judged spatial relations. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 422–437
Tappe, H. (2000). Perspektivenwahl in Beschreibungen dynamischer und statischer Wegeskizzen. In C. Habel & C. von Stutterheim (eds.), Räumliche Konzepte und sprachliche Strukturen. (pp. 69–95). Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
Taylor, H. & Tversky, B. (1992). Descriptions and depictions of environments. Memory and Cognition, 20, 483–496.
Thorndyke, P.W., & Hayes-Roth, B. (1982). Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 560–589.
Tschander, L.B., Schmidtke, H.R., Eschenbach, C., Habel, C. & Kulik, L. (2002). A geometric agent following route instructions. In C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel & K. Wender (eds.), Spatial Cognition III. Berlin: Springer.
Tversky B. (1993). Cognitive maps, cognitive collages and spatial mental models. In A. Frank & I. Campari (eds.) Spatial information theory: A theoretical basis for GIS. (pp. 14–24). Berlin: Springer.
Tversky, B. & Lee, P.U. (1999). Pictorial and verbal tools for conveying routes. In C. Freksa, D.M. Mark (eds.), Spatial information theory. Cognitive and computational foundations of geographic information science. (pp. 51–64). Berlin: Springer
Wahlster, W.; Blocher, A.; Baus, J.; Stopp, E. & Speiser, H. (1998). Ressourcenadaptive Objektlokalisation: Sprachliche Raumbeschreibung unter Zeitdruck. In Kognitionswissenschaft, 7, 111–117.
Wahlster, W.; Baus, J.; Kray, C. & Krüger, A. (2001). REAL: Ein ressourcenadaptierendes mobiles Navigationssystem, Informatik Forschung und Entwicklung, 16, 233–241.
Zhang, J. (1997). The nature of external representations in problem solving. Cognitive Science, 21, 179–217.
Zhang, J. & Norman, D. A. (1994). Representation in distributed cognitive tasks. Cognitive Science, 18, 87–122.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Klippel, A., Tappe, H., Habel, C. (2003). Pictorial Representations of Routes: Chunking Route Segments during Comprehension. In: Freksa, C., Brauer, W., Habel, C., Wender, K.F. (eds) Spatial Cognition III. Spatial Cognition 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2685. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45004-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45004-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40430-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45004-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive