Abstract
In this paper we aim to formally model the strongest motivational attitude occurring in teamwork, collective commitment. First, building on our previous work, a logical framework is sketched in which social commitments and collective intentions are formalized. Then, different versions of collective commitments are given, reflecting different aspects of Cooperative Problem Solving, and applicable in different situations. The definitions differ with respect to the aspects of teamwork of which the agents involved are aware, and the kind of awareness present within a team. This way a kind of tuning mechanism is provided for the system developer to tune a version of collective commitment fitting the circumstances. Finally, a few exemplar versions of collective commitment resulting from instantiating the general tuning scheme are presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
C. Castelfranchi. Commitments: From individual intentions to groups and organizations. In V. Lesser, editor, Proceedings First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, pages 41–48, San Francisco, 1995. AAAI-Press and MIT Press.
F. Dignum, B. Dunin-Keplicz, and R. Verbrugge. Creating collective intention through dialogue. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 9:145–158, 2001.
B. Dunin-Keplicz and R. Verbrugge. Collective commitments. In M. Tokoro, editor, Proceedings Second International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, pages 56–63, Menlo Park (CA), 1996. AAAI-Press.
B. Dunin-Keplicz and R. Verbrugge. A reconfiguration algorithm for distributed problem solving. Electronic Modeling, 22:68–86, 2000.
B. Dunin-Keplicz and R. Verbrugge. Collective intentions. Fundamenta Informaticae, 51(3):271–295, 2002.
R. Fagin, J. Halpern, Y. Moses, and M. Vardi. Reasoning about Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.
H. Levesque, P. Cohen, and J. Nunes. On acting together. In Proceedings Eighth National Conference on AI (AAAI90), pages 94–99, Menlo Park (CA), Cambridge (MA), 1990. AAAI-Press and MIT Press.
J.-J. C. Meyer and W. van der Hoek. Epistemic Logic for AI and Theoretical Computer Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995.
W. Quine. Quantifiers and propositional attitudes. Journal of Philosophy, 53:177–187, 1956.
M. Wooldridge and N. Jennings. Cooperative problem solving. Journal of Logic and Computation, 9:563–592, 1999.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dunin-Keplicz, B., Verbrugge, R. (2003). Calibrating Collective Commitments. In: Mařík, V., Pěchouček, M., Müller, J. (eds) Multi-Agent Systems and Applications III. CEEMAS 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2691. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45023-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45023-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40450-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45023-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive