Abstract
We discuss some issues concerning the application of learning classifier systems to real-valued applications. In particular, we focus on the possibility of classifying data by crisp and fuzzy intervals, showing the effect of their granularity on the learning performance. We introduce the concept of sensorial cluster and we discuss the difference between cluster aliasing and perceptual aliasing. We show the impact of different choices on the performance of both crisp and fuzzy learning classifier systems applied to a mobile, autonomous, robotic agent.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
A. Bonarini. Evolutionary learning of fuzzy rules: competition and cooperation. In W. Pedrycz, editor, Fuzzy modeling: paradigms and practice, pages 265–284, Norwell, MA, 1996. Kluwer Academic Press.
A. Bonarini. Anytime learning and adaptation of hierarchical fuzzy logic behaviors. Adaptive Behavior Journal, 5(3–4):281–315, 1997.
A. Bonarini. Reinforcement distribution to fuzzy classifiers: a methodology to extend crisp algorithms. In IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation — WCCI-ICEC’98, volume 1, pages 51–56, Piscataway, NJ, 1998. IEEE Computer Press.
A. Bonarini. Comparing reinforcement learning algorithms applied to crisp and fuzzy learning classifier systems. In IWLCS99, Cambridge, MA, 1999. AAAI Press.
A. Bonarini, C. Bonacina, and M. Matteucci. A framework to support the reinforcement function design. In preparation, 2000.
Andrea Bonarini. ELF: Learning incomplete fuzzy rule sets for an autonomous robot. In Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann, editor, First European Congress on Fuzzy and Intelligent Technologies — EUFIT’93, volume 1, pages 69–75, Aachen, D, 1993. Verlag der Augustinus Buchhandlung.
M. Dorigo and M. Colombetti. Robot shaping: an experiment in behavior engineering. MIT Press / Bradford Books, 1997.
G. J. Klir, B. Yuan, and U. St. Clair. Fuzzy set theory: foundations and applicatons. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, MA, 1997.
Lozano-Perez. Spatial planning: A configuration space approach. IEEE Transaction on Computers, C-32(2):26–38, feb 1983.
S. P. Singh and R. S. Sutton. reinforcement learning with replacing eligibility traces. Machine Learning, 22(1):123–158, 1996.
R. S. Sutton. Learning to predict by the method of temporal differences. Machine Learning, 3(1):9–44, 1988.
C. Watkins and P. Dayan. Q-learning. Machine Learning, 8:279–292, 1992.
S. D. Whitehead and D. H. Ballard. Learning to perceive and act by trial and error. Machine Learning, 7:45–83, 1991.
S. W. Wilson. Classifier fitness based on accuracy. Evolutionary Computation, 3(2):149–175, 1995.
L. A. Zadeh. Fuzzy sets. Information and control, 8:338–353, 1966.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bonarini, A., Bonacina, C., Matteucci, M. (2000). Fuzzy and Crisp Representations of Real-Valued Input for Learning Classifier Systems. In: Lanzi, P.L., Stolzmann, W., Wilson, S.W. (eds) Learning Classifier Systems. IWLCS 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1813. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45027-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45027-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67729-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45027-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive