Skip to main content

Computing Lower Bound for MAX-CSP Problems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Developments in Applied Artificial Intelligence (IEA/AIE 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2718))

Abstract

The inefficiency of the branch and bound method for solving Constraint Optimization Problems is due in most cases to the poor quality of the lower bound used by this method. Many works have been proposed to improve the quality of this bound. In this, paper we investigate a set of lower bounds by considering two criteria: the quality and the computing cost. We study different ways to compute the parameters of the parametric lower bound and we propose heuristics for searching the parameters maximizing the parametric lower bound. Computational experiments performed over randomly generated problems show the advantages of our new branch and bound scheme.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M.S. Affane and H. Bennaceur,‘A weighted arc consistency technique for max-CSP’, in Proc. of the 13th ECAI, pp. 209–213, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. [1] E. C. Freuder and R. J. Wallace, ‘Partial Constraint Satisfaction’, Artificial Intelligence, 58, 21–70, (1992).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Hubbe and E.C. Freuder, ‘An Efficient Cross-Product Representation of the Constraint Satisfaction Problem Search Space’, in Proc. of the 10th National Conferenceon Artificial Intelligence (AAAI92), pp. 421–427, (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Larrosa and P. Meseguer, ‘Exploiting the Use of DAC in MAXCSP’, in Proc. of the 2nd International Conference on Principle and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP96, LNCS 1118), pp. 308–322, Cambridge, MA, USA, (1996). bibitem Larrosa:01 R. Dechter and Kalev Kask and J. Larrosa, ‘A General Scheme for Multiple Lower Bound Computation in Constraint Optimization’, in Proc. of the 2nd International Conference on Principle and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP01, LNCS 2239), pp. 346–360, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Larrosa and P. Meseguer, ‘Phase Transition in MAXCSP’, in Proc. of the 12th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI96), pp. 190–194, Budapest, Hungary, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Larrosa and P. Meseguer and T. Schiex, ‘Maintaining reversible DAC for MAXCSP’, in Artificial Intelligence, 107(1):149–163 (1999).

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. P. Meseguer and J. Larrosa, ‘Constraint Satisfaction as Global Optimization’, in Proc. of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI95), pp. 579–584, Montr’eal, CANADA, (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  8. U. Montanari, ‘Networks of Constraints: Fundamental Properties and Applications to Picture Processing’, Inform. Sci., 7 n2, 95–132, (1974).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. P.M. Pardalos, F. Rendl, and H. Wolkowicz, ‘The Quadratic Assignment Problem: A Survey and Recent Developments’, in DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Neuhauser, Wolsey, ‘Integer and Combinatorial Optimization’, Wiley ed., (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Wallace, in Proc. of the Third International Conference on the Practical Application of Constraint Technology (PACT97), London, UK, (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.J. Wallace, ‘Directed Arc Consistency Preprocessing’, in Proc. of the ECAI94 Workshop on constraint Processing (LNCS 923), pp. 121–137, (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R.J. Wallace, ‘Enhancements of Branch and Bound Methods for the Maximal Constraint Satisfaction Problem’, in Proc. of the 13th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI96), pp. 188–195, Portland, OR, USA, (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wallace, R.: 1995, ‘Directed Arc Consistency Preprocessing’. In: M. Meyer (ed.): Selected papers from the ECAI94 Workshop on Constraint Processing, No. 923 in LNCS. Berlin: Springer, pp. 121–137.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bannaceur, H., Osmani, A. (2003). Computing Lower Bound for MAX-CSP Problems. In: Chung, P.W.H., Hinde, C., Ali, M. (eds) Developments in Applied Artificial Intelligence. IEA/AIE 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2718. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45034-3_62

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45034-3_62

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40455-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45034-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics