Skip to main content

Degree Distribution of the FKP Network Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2719))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Recently, Fabrikant, Koutsoupias and Papadimitriou [7] introduced a natural and beautifully simple model of network growth involving a trade-off between geometric and network objectives, with relative strength characterized by a single parameter which scales as a power of the number of nodes. In addition to giving experimental results, they proved a power-law lower bound on part of the degree sequence, for a wide range of scalings of the parameter. Here we prove that, despite the FKP results, the overall degree distribution is very far from satisfying a power law.

First, we establish that for almost all scalings of the parameter, either all but a vanishingly small fraction of the nodes have degree 1, or there is exponential decay of node degrees. In the former case, a power law can hold for only a vanishingly small fraction of the nodes. Furthermore, we show that in this case there is a large number of nodes with almost maximum degree. So a power law fails to hold even approximately at either end of the degree range. Thus the power laws found in [7] are very different from those given by other internet models or found experimentally [8].

Research undertaken during an internship at Microsoft Research.

Research supported by NSF grant DSM 9971788 and DARPA grant F33615-01-C-1900.

Research undertaken while visiting Microsoft Research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R. Albert and A.-L. Barabási, Statistical mechanics of complex networks, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74 (2002), 47–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A.-L. Barabási and R. Albert, Emergence of scaling in random networks, Science 286 (1999), 509–512.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. B. Bollobás and O.M. Riordan, The diameter of a scale-free random graph, to appear in Combinatorica. (Preprint available from http://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~omr10/.)

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Bollobás and O. Riordan, Mathematical results on scale-free random graphs, in Handbook of Graphs and Networks, Stefan Bornholdt and Heinz Georg Schuster (eds.), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim (2002), 1–34.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. J.M. Carlson and J. Doyle, Highly optimized tolerance: a mechanism for power laws in designed systems. Phys. Rev. E 60 (1999), 1412–1427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S.N. Dorogovtsev and J.F.F. Mendes, Evolution of networks, Adv. Phys. 51 (2002), 1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Fabrikant, E. Koutsoupias and C.H. Papadimitriou, Heuristically optimized trade-offs: a new paradigm for power laws in the internet ICALP 2002, LNCS 2380, pp. 110–122.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Faloutsos, P. Faloutsos and C. Faloutsos, On power-law relationships of the internet topology, SIGCOMM 1999, Comput. Commun. Rev. 29 (1999), 251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Kumar, P. Raghavan, S. Rajagopalan, D. Sivakumar, A. Tomkins and E. Upfal, Stochastic models for the web graph, FOCS 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  10. H.M. Mahmoud and R.T. Smythe, A survey of recursive trees, Th. of Probability and Math. Statistics 51 (1995), 1–27.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. M.D. Penrose, A strong law for the largest nearest-neighbour link between random points, J. London Math. Soc. (2) 60 (1999), 951–960.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. M.D. Penrose, A strong law for the longest edge of the minimal spanning tree. Ann. Probab. 27 (1999), 246–260.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. B. Pittel, Note on the heights of random recursive trees and random m-ary search trees, Random Struct. Alg. 5 (1994), 337–347.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Berger, N., Bollobás, B., Borgs, C., Chayes, J., Riordan, O. (2003). Degree Distribution of the FKP Network Model. In: Baeten, J.C.M., Lenstra, J.K., Parrow, J., Woeginger, G.J. (eds) Automata, Languages and Programming. ICALP 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2719. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45061-0_57

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45061-0_57

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40493-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45061-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics