Skip to main content

Remembering Similitude Terms in CBR

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition (MLDM 2003)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2734))

Abstract

In concept learning, inductive techniques perform a global approximation to the target concept. Instead, lazy learning techniques use local approximations to form an implicit global approximation of the target concept. In this paper we present C-LID, a lazy learning technique that uses LID for generating local approximations to the target concept. LID generates local approximations in the form of similitude terms (symbolic descriptions of what is shared by 2 or more cases). C-LID caches and reuses the similitude terms generated in past cases to improve the problem solving of future problems. The outcome of C-LID (and LID) is assessed with experiments on the Toxicology dataset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. E. Armengol and E. Plaza. Bottom-up induction of feature terms. Machine Learning, 41(1):259–294, 2000.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. E. Armengol and E. Plaza. Individual prognosis of diabetes long-term risks: A CBR approach. Methods of Information in Medicine, pages 46–51, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Armengol and E. Plaza. Lazy induction of descriptions for relational case-based learning. In Machine Learning: ECML-2002, number 2167 in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 13–24. Springer-Verlag, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. C. Helma, R. King, S. Kramer, and A. Srinivasan. The predictive toxicology challenge 2000–2001. In ECML/PKDD 2001. Freiburg, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ramon López de Mántaras. A distance-based attribute selection measure for decision tree induction. Machine Learning, 6:81–92, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. T.M. Mitchell. Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill International Editions. Computer Science Series, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bernhard Pfahringer. (the futility of) trying to predict carcinogenicity of chemical compounds. In Proceedings of the Predictive Toxicology Challenge Workshop, Freiburg, Germany, 2001., 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Armengol, E., Plaza, E. (2003). Remembering Similitude Terms in CBR. In: Perner, P., Rosenfeld, A. (eds) Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition. MLDM 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2734. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45065-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45065-3_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40504-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45065-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics