Skip to main content

Creating Semantic Representations of Diagrams

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Applications of Graph Transformations with Industrial Relevance (AGTIVE 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1779))

Abstract

Diagrams that serve as a visual input facility for programming environments have to be translated into some kind of semantic description. This paper describes such a method which is based on a specification of the translation process. The translation process starts with a diagram, which is simply represented as a collection of atomic diagram components, and it ends up with some data structure as a semantic representation of the diagram. The specification of the translation process mainly consists of two parts: the specification of spatial relationships between atomic diagram components in terms of their numeric parameters (e.g., position, size), and an attributed hypergraph grammar that describes the concrete diagram syntax as well as the rules for generating the semantic representation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Deutsche Norm DIN EN 61131 Teil 3“Speicherprogrammierbare Steuerungen —Programmiersprachen”. Beuth Verlag, Berlin, 1994. in German.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Andries, G. Engels, and J. Rekers. How to represent a visual specification. In K. Marriott and B. Meyer, editors, Visual Language Theory, pages 245–260. Springer Verlag, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Bardohl, M. Minas, A. Schürr, and G. Taentzer. Application of graph transformation to visual languages. In H. Ehrig, G. Engels, H.-J. Kreowski, and G. Rozenberg, editors, Handbook of Graph Grammars and Computing by Graph Transformation, volume II: Applications, Languages and Tools, pages 105–180. World Scientific, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H. Bunke. Attributed programmed graph grammars and their application to schematic diagram interpretation. IEEE pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 4(6):574–582, 1982.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. W. Citrin, R. Hall, and B. Zorn. Programming with visual expressions. In VL’95 [22], pages 294–301, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Costagliola, G. Tortora, S. Orefice, and A. D. Lucia. Automatic generation of visual programming environments. IEEE Computer, 28(3):56–66, Mar. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Erwig. Semantics of visual languages. In VL’ 97 [24], pages 304–311, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  8. H. Göttler. Attributed graph grammars for graphics. In H. Ehrig, M. Nagl, and G. Rozenberg, editors, Graph Grammars and Their Application to Computer Science, volume 153 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 130–142, 1983.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. V. Haarslev. Formal semantics of visual languages using spatial reasoning. In VL’95 [22], pages 156–163, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D._E. Knuth. Semantics of context-free languages. Mathematical Systems Theory, 2(2):127–145, 1968. Errata 5:1 (1971) 95–96.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. K. Mehlhorn. Data Structures and Algorithms 3, Multi-dimensional Searching and Computational Geometry. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Minas. Diagram editing with hypergraph parser support. In VL’97 [24], pages 230–237, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Minas. Hypergraphs as a uniform diagram representation model. In Preliminary Proc. 6th International Workshop on Theory and Application of Graph Transformations (TAGT’98), Paderborn, Germany, pages 24–31. University of Paderborn, Technical Report tr-ri-98-201, Nov. 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Minas and G. Viehstaedt. DiaGen: A generator for diagram editors providing direct manipulation and execution of diagrams. In VL’95 [22], pages 203–210.

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Minas and G. Viehstaedt. Specification of diagram editors providing layout adjustment with minimal change. In VL’93 [20], pages 324–329.

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. Neumann, E. E. Grötsch, C. Lubkoll, and R. Simon. SPS-Standard: IEC 1131. Oldenbourg, 1995. in German.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Rekers and A. Schürr. A graph based framework for the implementation of visual environments. In VL’96 [23], pages 148–155, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Schürr. Specification of graph translators with triple graph grammars. In Proc. of the 20th International Workshop on Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science, number 904 in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 151–163, Berlin, 1994. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. Viehstaedt and M. Minas. Interaction in really graphical user interfaces. In VL’94 [21], pages 270–277.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 1993 IEEE Symp. on Visual Languages, Bergen, Norway. IEEE Computer Society Press, Aug. 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 1994 IEEE Symp. on Visual Languages, St. Louis, Missouri. IEEE Computer Society Press, Oct. 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 1995 IEEE Symp. on Visual Languages (VL’95), Darmstadt, Germany. IEEE Computer Society Press, Sept. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 1996 IEEE Symp. on Visual Languages (VL’96), Boulder, Colorado. IEEE Computer Society Press, Sept. 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  24. 1997 IEEE Symp. on Visual Languages (VL’97), Capri, Italy. IEEE Computer Society Press, Sept. 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. Wang and H. Zeevat. A syntax directed approach to picture semantics. In K. Marriott and B. Meyer, editors, Visual Language Theory, pages 307–324. Springer Verlag, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Minas, M. (2000). Creating Semantic Representations of Diagrams. In: Nagl, M., Schürr, A., Münch, M. (eds) Applications of Graph Transformations with Industrial Relevance. AGTIVE 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1779. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45104-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45104-8_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67658-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45104-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics