Skip to main content

Maintaining a Jointly Constructed Student Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications (AIMSA 2000)

Abstract

Allowing the student to have some control over the diagnosis inspecting and changing the model the system has made of him is a feasible approach in student modelling which tracks the dynamics of student behaviour and provides for reflective learning. We present an approach for maintaining the student model in interactive diagnosis where a computer and a student discuss about the student’s knowledge. A belief modal operator is adapted to model the knowledge of the learner and to help in maintaining the interaction between the computer system and the learner. A mechanism for finding agreements and conflicts between system and learner’s views is described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J.A. Self, The defining characteristics of intelligent tutoring systems research: ITSs care, precisely, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 350–364, (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.A. Self, Bypassing the intractable problem of student modelling, in C. Frasson & G. Gauthier eds., Intelligent Tutoring Systems: At the Crossroad of Artificial Intelligence and Education, Ablex, NJ, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Bull, Collaborative Student Modelling in Foreign Language Learning, PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Morales, H. Pain, S. Bull & J. Kay, Proceedings of the Workshop on Open, Interactive, and Other Overt Approaches to Learner Modelling, Le Mans, France, July 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Kobsa, User modelling in dialogue systems: potentials and hazards, AI & Society, 1, 214–240, (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Brusilovsky, Methods and Techniques of Adaptive Hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 6(2/3), 87–129, (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. V. Dimitrova, J.A. Self & P. Brna, The interactive maintenance of open learner models, in Lajoie S.P. and Vivet M., eds., Proceedings of the 9th conference of AI in Education, Frontiers in AI and Applications, vol. 50, IOS Press, pp. 405–412, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Paiva and J.A. Self, TAGUS-a user and learner modelling workbench, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4, 197–226, (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J. Kay, The UM toolkit for cooperative user modelling, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4, 149–196, (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J.A. Self, Computational Mathetics, http://www.cbl.leeds.ac.uk/~jas/cm.html.

  11. R. Fagin, J.Y. Halpern, Y. Moses & M.Y. Vardi, Reasoning about Knowledge, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 1995.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Taylor, J. Carletta, C. Mellish, Requirements for belief models in cooperative dialogue, User Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction, 6, 23–68, (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Ballim and Y. Wilks, Artificial Believers: The Ascription of Belief, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Kobsa, and W. Pohl,, The user modeling shell system BGP-MS. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 4(2), 59–106, (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Bull and P. Brna, Enhancing peer interaction in the Solar system, in Brna P., Baker M. and Stenning K. eds., Roles of communicative interaction in learning to model in Mathematics and Science, Proceedings of the C-LEMMAS conference, April 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. Dimitrova, J.A. Self & P. Brna, STyLE-OLM-an interactive diagnosis tool in a terminology learning environment, in the Proceedings of the Workshop on Open, Interactive, and Other Overt Approaches to Learner Modelling, Le Mans, France, July 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Sowa, Conceptual graphs: draft proposed American national standard, in Proceedings of ICCS-99-Conceptual Structures: Standards and Practices, Lecture Notes of Artificial Intelligence 1640, Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 1–65, 1999.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. G. Angelova, A. Nenkova, Sv. Boycheva, and T. Nikolov, CGs as a Knowledge Representation Core in a Complex Language Learning Environment, in the Proceedings of ICCS-2000, Darmstadt, Germany, August 2000, to appear.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Levin & J. Moore, Dialogue games: meta-communication structures for natural language interaction, Cognitive Science, 1, 395–420, (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dimitrova, V., Self, J., Bma, P. (2000). Maintaining a Jointly Constructed Student Model. In: Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications. AIMSA 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1904. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45331-8_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45331-8_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41044-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45331-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics