Skip to main content

A Conceptual Modeling Framework for Multi-agent Information Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Conceptual Modeling — ER 2000 (ER 2000)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1920))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 695 Accesses

Abstract

This paper presents a multi-agent conceptual model for resource allocation in a manufacturing environment. To attain this purpose a framework called M-DRAP — Multi-agent Dynamic Resources Allocation Planning — was developed. Multi-agent systems have been employed as a solution for problems that require decentralization and distribution in both decision-making and execution process. This is a premise in many information systems where (i) the domain involves intrinsic distribution of data, problem-solving capabilities and responsibilities; (ii) it is necessary to maintain the autonomy of the subparts, without lost of organizational structure; and (iii) the problem solution cannot be completely described a priori due to the possibility of real-time perturbations in the environment (equipment failures, for example) and also as a consequence of the natural dynamics of the business process. The main contribution of this work is the proposition of a set of activities and models defining a framework to represent multi-agent systems for business process under an enterprise model perspective.

This work was partially supported by CNPq 523.883/96-0, 572021/97-6 and FAPERGS 99/0360.9 grants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baker, A.D. Metaphor or reality: a case study where agents bid with actual costs to schedule a factory, in Clearwater, S.C. (Ed.) Market-Based Control: A Paradigm for Distributed Resource Allocation. World Scientific, p.185–223, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bastos, R.M., Oliveira, J. Palazzo M. & Oliveira, F.M., Decentralised Resource Allocation Planning through Negotiation, in Camariha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H. & Marik, V. (Eds.) Intelligent Systems for Manufacturing: Multi-Agent Systems and Virtual Organization. Kluwer Academic Publishers, p. 67–76,1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bastos, R.M.; Oliveira, J.P.M.; Oliveira, F.M. Real-Time Resources Allocation Planning under a Market-Oriented Behaviour Perspective, in Proceedings of the 15th ISPE/IEE International Conference on CAD/CAM, Robotics & Factories of the Future — CAR&FOF’99, p. MW6–6–MW6–11, águas de Lindóia-SÃo Paulo, Brasil, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Booch, G. Rumbaugh, J. & Jacobson, I. The Unified Modeling Language User Guide. Addison-Wesley Pub Co, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cantamessa, M. Agent-based Modeling and Management of Manufacturing Systems. Computers in Industry, Amsterdam, v. 34, p. 173–186, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Davis, R. & Smith, R.G. Negotiation as a Metaphor for Distributed Problem Solving, in Bond, A.H., Gasser, L. (Eds.), Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, USA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hirschfeld, Henrique Planejamento com PERT-CPM e Análise do Desempenho, Atlas, SÄo Paulo, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  8. IFAC-IFIP Task Force. GERAM: Generalized Enterprise Reference Architecture and Methodology, Version 1.5, IFAC-IFIP Task Force on Architecture for Enterprise Integration, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jennings, N.R. et ali. Using intelligent agents to manage business processes,. in Proceedings of Practical Applications of Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Technology — PAAM’96, London, UK, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jennings, N. R. & Wooldridge, M Agent-Oriented Software Engineering, in Bradshaw, J. (Ed.) Handbook of Agent Technology, AAAI/MIT Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Maturana, F., SHEN, W. & NORRIE, D.H., MetaMorph: An Adaptive Agent-Based Architecture for Intelligent Manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 37(10), p.2159–2174, 1999.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Moulin, B.; Chaib-Draa, B. An overview of distributed artificial intelligence. In: O’hare, G.M.P.; Jennings, N.R. (Eds.). Foundations of distributed artificial intelligence. New York: John Wiley & Sons, p.3–55, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Oliveira, E., Fonseca, J.M. & Steiger-GarÇÃo, A. MACIV: A DAI Based Resource Management System. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 11:525–550, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rabelo, R.; Camarinha-Matos, L.M. A Holistic Control Architecture Infrastructure for Dynamic Scheduling, in Kerr, R.; Szelke, E. (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Reactive Scheduling. Chapman & Hall, p. 78–94, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shoham, Y. Agent-oriented programming. Artificial Intelligence, Amsterdam, v.60, p.51–92, 1993.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Taveter, K. Business Rules’ Approach to the Modelling, Design and Implementation of Agent-Oriented Information System, in Proceedings of International Bi-Conference Workshop on Agent-Oriented Information Systems-AOIS’99, Seattle, USA, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vernadat, F. Manufacturing systems modeling, specification and analysis, in Proceedings of IFIP WG5.7-Working Conference on Evaluation of Production Management Methods, Gramado, Brasil, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wellman, M.P. Market-oriented programming: some early lessons, in Clearwater, S.H. (Ed.) Market-Based Control: A Paradigm for Distributed Resource Allocation, World Scientific, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N. R., and & Kinny, D., A Methodology for Agent-Oriented Analysis and Design, in Proceedings of. 3rd Int Conference on Autonomous Agents-Agents-99, Seattle, USA, p.69–76, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yourdon, E.; Argila, C. Case Studies in Object-Oriented Analysis & Design. USA: Yourdon Press, 1996.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Zelm, M. et ali. The CIMOSA business modelling process, Computers in Industry, 27, p.123–142, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bastos, R.M., Palazzo M. de Oliveira, J. (2000). A Conceptual Modeling Framework for Multi-agent Information Systems. In: Laender, A.H.F., Liddle, S.W., Storey, V.C. (eds) Conceptual Modeling — ER 2000. ER 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1920. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45393-8_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45393-8_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41072-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45393-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics