Abstract
Human-centered automation (HCA) maximizes the goals of humans by supporting a full range of interactions between humans and autonomous systems. The key goal of this research is to minimize the necessity for human interaction, but maximize the capability to interact. Within HCA we define adjustable autonomy as the ability of autonomous systems to operate with dynamically varying levels of independence, intelligence and control. HCA encompasses adjustable autonomy and interfaces it with Human-Computer Interaction (HCI).
The motivations for human-centered automation are many. They include technical issues such as an inability to automate certain aspects of a task because of its complexity or because of an uncertain or changing operating environment. They also include non-technical issues such as a desire to allow for human intervention even when full autonomy is possible. These latter motivations may include safety, training, maintenance or calibration.
The benefits of human-centered automation include the ability to partially automate a system when full automation is not possible. Other benefits are lower costs because difficult-to-automate parts of the system can be left to humans and increased operator acceptance of an autonomous system.
Early work in human-centered autonomous systems has been conducted at NASA Johnson Space Center [Bonasso et al., 1997, Kortenkamp et al., 2000], at NASA Ames Research Center [Dorais et al., 1998], at the Honeywell Technology Center [Musliner and Krebsbach, 1999] and the University of Texas [Barber et al., 1999].
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Reference
Suzanne Barber, Anul Goel, and Cheryl Martin. The motivation for dynamic adaptive autonomy in agent-based systems. In Proceedings of the First Asia-Pacific Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology (IAT’ 99, 1999.
R. Peter Bonasso, David Kortenkamp, and Troy Whitney. Using a robot control architecture to automate space shuttle operations. In Proceedings of the 1997 Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, 1997.
Gregory Dorais, R. Peter Bonasso, David Kortenkamp, Barney Pell, and Debra Schreckenghost. Adjustable autonomy for human-centered autonomous systems on mars. In Proceedings of the Mars Society Conference, 1998.
David Kortenkamp, Debra Keirn-Schreckenghost, and R. Peter Bonasso. Adjustable control autonomy for manned space flight. In Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, 2000.
David Musliner and Kurt Krebsbach. Adjustable autonomy in procedure control for refineries. In Working Notes of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Agents with Adjustable Autonomy, 1999.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dorais, G., Kortenkamp, D. (2001). Designing Human-Centered Autonomous Agents. In: Kowalczyk, R., Loke, S.W., Reed, N.E., Williams, G.J. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. PRICAI 2000 Workshop Reader. PRICAI 2000. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2112. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45408-X_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45408-X_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42597-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45408-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive