Skip to main content

Upper Bounds on the Size of One-Way Quantum Finite Automata

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Theoretical Computer Science (ICTCS 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2202))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We show that, for any stochastic event p of period n, there exists a measure-once one-way quantum finite automaton (1qfa) with at most \( 2\sqrt {6n} + 25 \) states inducing the event ap + b, for constants a > 0, b ≤ 0, satisfying a + b ≤ 1. This fact is proved by designing an algorithm which constructs the desired 1qfa in polynomial time. As a consequence, we get that any periodic language of period n can be accepted with isolated cut point by a 1qfa with no more than \( 2\sqrt {6n} + 26 \) states. Our results give added evidence of the strength of measure-once 1qfa’s with respect to classical automata.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Aho, J. Hopcroft and J. Ullman. The Design and Analysis of Computer Algorithms. Addison-Wesley, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Ambainis, A. Ķikusts and M. Valdats. On the Class of Languages Recognizable by 1-way Quantum Finite Automata. In Proc. 18th Annual Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2010, Springer, pp. 305–316, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Ambainis and J. Watrous. Two-way Finite Automata with Quantum and Classical States. Technical Report quant-ph/9911009, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Ambainis and R. Freivalds. 1-way Quantum Finite Automata: Strengths, Weaknesses and Generalizations. In Proc. 39th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 332–342, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Brodsky and N. Pippenger. Characterizations of 1-Way Quantum Finite Automata. Technical Report, Department of Computer Science, University of British Columbia, TR-99-03, 2000 Revised.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Colbourn and A. Ling. Quorums from di.erence covers. Information Processing Letters, 75:9–12, 2000.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. L. Grover. A Fast Quantum Mechanical Algorithm for Database Search. In Proc. 28th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 212–219, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Gruska. Descriptional complexity issues in quantum computing. J. Automata, Languages and Combinatorics, 5:191–218, 2000.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. T. Jiang, E. McDowell and B. Ravikumar. The structure and complexity of minimal nfa’s over a unary alphabet. Int. J. Found. Comp. Sc., 2:163–182, 1991.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Ķikusts. A Small 1-way Quantum Finite Automaton. Technical Report quant-ph/9810065, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Kohn. Practical Numerical Methods: Algorithms and Programs. The Macmillan Company, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Kondacs and J. Watrous. On the Power of Quantum Finite State Automata. In Proc. 38th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 66–75, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Marcus and H. Minc. Introduction to Linear Algebra. The Macmillan Company, 1965. Reprinted by Dover, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Marcus and H. Minc. A Survey of Matrix Theory and Matrix Inequalities. Prindle, Weber & Schmidt, 1964. Reprinted by Dover, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  15. C. Mereghetti and G. Pighizzini. Two-Way Automata Simulations and Unary Languages. J. Automata, Languages and Combinatorics, 5:287–300, 2000.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. C. Mereghetti, B. Palano and G. Pighizzini. On the succinctness of deterministic, nondeterministic, probabilistic and quantum finite automata. In Pre-Proc. Descriptional Complexity of Automata, Grammars and Related Structures (DCAGRS 2001). To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  17. C. Moore and J. Crutchfield. Quantum automata and quantum grammars. Theoretical Computer Science, 237:275–306, 2000.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. P. Shor. Algorithms for Quantum Computation: Discrete Logarithms and Factoring. In Proc. 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 124–134, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  19. P. Shor. Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer. SIAM J. Computing, 26:1484–1509, 1997.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. B. Wichmann. A note on restricted di.erence bases. J. London Math. Soc., 38:465–466, 1963.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mereghetti, C., Palano, B. (2001). Upper Bounds on the Size of One-Way Quantum Finite Automata. In: Theoretical Computer Science. ICTCS 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2202. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45446-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45446-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42672-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45446-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics