Abstract
We present an approach to spatial inference which is based on the procedural semantics of spatial relations. In contrast to qualitative reasoning, we do not use discrete symbolic models. Instead, relations between pairs of objects are represented by parameterized homogeneous transformation matrices with numerical constraints. A textual description of a spatial scene is transformed into a graph with objects and annotated local reference systems as nodes and relations as arcs. Inference is realized by multiplication of transformation matrices, constraint propagation and verification. Constraints consisting of equations and inequations containing trigonometric functions can be solved using machine learning techniques. By assigning values to the parameters and using heuristics for the placement of objects, a visualization of the described spatial layout can be generated from the graph.
This research was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) in the project “Modelling Inferences in Mental Models” (Wy 20/2-2) within the priority program on spatial cognition ( “Raumkognition” ).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ambler, A. P. and R. J. Popplestone (1975). Inferring the Positions of Bodies from Specified Spatial Relationships. Artificial Intelligence 6, 157–174.
Claus, B., K. Eyferth, C. Gips, R. Hörnig, U. Schmid, S. Wiebrock, and F. Wysotzki (1998). Reference Frames for Spatial Inferences in Text Comprehension. In C. Freksa, C. Habel, and K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial Cognition-An Interdisciplinary Approach to Representing and Processing Spatial Knowledge, Springer.
Clementini, E., P.D. Felice, and D. Hernández (1997). Qualitative representation of positional information. Artificial Intelligence 95, 317–356.
Hernández, D. (1994). Qualitative Representation of Spatial Knowledge. Springer.
Hörnig, R., B. Claus, and K. Eyferth (1999). In Search for an Overall Organizing Principle in Spatial Mental Models: A Question of Inference. In S. O’Nuallain and M. Hagerty (Eds.), Spatial Cognition; Foundations and Applications. John Benjamins. Forthcoming.
Hörnig, R., K. Eyferth, and H. Gärtner (2000). Orienting and Reorienting in Egocentric Mental Models. This volume.
Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983). Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference and Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jörding, T. and I. Wachsmuth (1996). An Antropomorphic Agent for the Use of Spatial Language. In Proceedings of ECAI’96-Workshop on Representation and Processing of Spatial Expressions, S. 41–53.
Musto, A., K. Stein, A. Eisenkolb, T. Röfer, W. Brauer, and K. Schill (2000). From Motion Observation to Qualitative Motion Representation. This volume.
Schlieder, C. and B. Behrendt (1998). Mental model construction in spatial reasoning: a comparison of two computational theories. In U. Schmid, J. Krems, and F. Wysotzki (Eds.), Mind modelling: a cognitive science approach to reasoning, learning, and discovery, Lengerich, S. 133–162. Pabst Science Publishers.
Schmid, U., S. Wiebrock, and F. Wysotzki (1999). Modelling Spatial Inferences in Text Understanding. In S. O’Nuallain and M. Hagerty (Eds.), Spatial Cognition; Foundations and Applications. John Benjamins. Forthcoming.
Schulmeister, B. and F. Wysotzki (1997). DIPOL-A Hybrid Piecewise Linear Classifier. In G. Nakhaeizadeh and C. C. Taylor (Eds.), Machine Learning and Statistics-The Interface, S. 133–152. Wiley.
Stolp, R., B. Weber, M. Müller, S. Wiebrock, and F. Wysotzki (1999). Zielgerichtete Trainingsmethoden des Maschinellen Lernens am Beispiel von DIPOL. In P. Perner (Ed.), Maschinelles Lernen, FGML’99. IBaI Report.
Uhr, H., P. Griebel, M. Pöpping, and G. Szwillus (1997). Parcon: ein schneller Solver für grafische Constraints. KI 97(1), 40–45.
Waltz, D. (1975). Understanding Line Drawings of Scenes with Shadows. In P. H. Winston (Ed.), Psychology of Computer Vision. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Wiebrock, S. and F. Wysotzki (1999). Lernen von räumlichen Relationen mit CAL5 und DIPOL. Fachberichte des Fachbereichs Informatik No. 99-17, TU Berlin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wiebrock, S., Wittenburg, L., Schmid, U., Wysotzki, F. (2000). Inference and Visualization of Spatial Relations. In: Freksa, C., Habel, C., Brauer, W., Wender, K.F. (eds) Spatial Cognition II. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1849. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45460-8_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45460-8_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-67584-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45460-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive