Skip to main content

Deciding DPDA Equivalence Is Primitive Recursive

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2380))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Recently Sénizergues showed decidability of the equivalence problem for deterministic pushown automata. The proof of decidability is two semi-decision procedures that do not give a complexity upper bound for the problem. Here we show that there is a simpler deterministic decision procedure that has a primitive recursive upper bound.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ginsberg, S., and Greibach, S. (1966). Deterministic context-free languages. Information and Control, 620–648.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Harrison, M. (1978). Introduction to Formal Language Theory, Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Harrison, M., and Havel, I. (1973). Strict deterministic grammars. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 7, 237–277.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Harrison, M., Havel, I., and Yehudai, A. (1979). On equivalence of grammars through transformation trees. Theoretical Computer Science, 9, 173–205.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Korenjak, A and Hopcroft, J. (1966). Simple deterministic languages. Procs. 7th Annual IEEE Symposium on Switching and Automata Theory, 36–46.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sénizergues, G. (1997). The equivalence problem for deterministic pushdown automata is decidable. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1256, 671–681.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sénizergues, G. (2001). L(A) = L(B)? decidability results from complete formal systems. Theoretical Computer Science, 251, 1–166.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Sénizergues, G. (2001). L(A) = L(B)? a simplified decidability proof. pp. 1–58. To appear in Theoretical Computer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stirling, C. (2001). Decidability of DPDA equivalence. Theoretical Computer Science, 255, 1–31.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Stirling, C. (2001). An introduction to decidability of DPDA equivalence. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2245, 42–56.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Stirling, C. (2002). Deciding DPDA Equivalence Is Primitive Recursive. In: Widmayer, P., Eidenbenz, S., Triguero, F., Morales, R., Conejo, R., Hennessy, M. (eds) Automata, Languages and Programming. ICALP 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2380. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45465-9_70

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45465-9_70

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43864-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45465-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics