Skip to main content

A Banach-Mazur Computable But Not Markov Computable Function on the Computable Real Numbers

Extended Abstract

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2380))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We consider two classical computability notions for functions mapping all computable real numbers to computable real numbers. It is clear that any function that is computable in the sense of Markov, i.e., computable with respect to a standard Gödel numbering of the computable real numbers, is computable in the sense of Banach and Mazur, i.e., it maps any computable sequence of real numbers to a computable sequence of real numbers. We show that the converse is not true. This solves a long-standing open problem; see Kushner [9].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O. Aberth. Computable Analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Banach and S. Mazur. Sur les fonctions calculables. Ann. Soc. Pol. de Math., 16:223, 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. M. Friedberg. 4—quantifier completeness: A Banach—Mazur functional not uniformly partial recursive. Bulletin de l’Academie Polonaise des Sciences, Série des sci. math., astr. et phys., 6(1):1–5, 1958.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Grzegorczyk. Computable functionals. Fundamenta Mathematicae, 42:168–202, 1955.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. P. Hertling. Banach-Mazur computable functions on metric spaces. In J. Blanck, V. Brattka, and P. Hertling, editors, Computability and Complexity in Analysis, volume 2064 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 69–81, Berlin, 2001. Springer. 4th International Workshop, CCA 2000, Swansea, UK, September 2000.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. K.-I. Ko. Complexity Theory of Real Functions. Progress in Theoretical Computer Science. Birkhäuser, Boston, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Kreisel, D. Lacombe, and J. Shoenfield. Partial recursive functionals and effective operations. In A. Heyting, editor, Constructivity in Mathematics, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, pages 290–297, Amsterdam, 1959. North-Holland. Proc. Colloq., Amsterdam, Aug. 26–31, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. A. Kušner. Lectures on Constructive Mathematical Analysis, volume 60. American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. A. Kušner. Markov’s constructive analysis; a participant’s view. Theoretical Computer Science, 219:267–285, 1999.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. D. Lacombe. Classes récursivement fermés et fonctions majorantes. Comptes Rendus Académie des Sciences Paris, 240:716–718, June 1955. Théorie des fonctions.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. A. Markov. On the continuity of constructive functions (Russian). Uspekhi Mat. Nauk (N.S.), 9:226–230, 1954.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Mazur. Computable Analysis, volume 33. Razprawy Matematyczne, Warsaw, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. B. Pour-El. A comparison of five “computable” operators. Zeitschrift für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagen der Mathematik, 6:325–340, 1960.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. M. B. Pour-El and J. I. Richards. Computability in Analysis and Physics. Perspectives in Mathematical Logic. Springer, Berlin, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. O. Slisenko. Examples of a nondiscontinuous but not continuous constructive operator in a metric space. Tr. Mat. Inst. Steklov, 72:524–532, 1964. (in Russian, English trans. in AMS Trans. 100, 1972).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. G. S. Tseitin. Uniform recursiveness of algorithmic operators on general recursive functions and a canonical representation for constructive functions of a real argument. In Proc. Third All—Union Math. Congr., Moscow 1956, volume 1, pages 188–189, Moscow, 1956. Izdat. Akad. Nauk SSSR. (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  17. G. S. Tseitin. Algorithmic operators in constructive complete separable metric spaces. Doklady Akad. Nauk, 128:49–52, 1959. (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  18. G. S. Tseitin. Algorithmic operators in constructive metric spaces. Tr. Mat. Inst. Steklov, 67:295–361, 1962. (in Russian, English trans. in AMS Trans. 64, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  19. K. Weihrauch. Computable Analysis. Springer, Berlin, 2000.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hertling, P. (2002). A Banach-Mazur Computable But Not Markov Computable Function on the Computable Real Numbers. In: Widmayer, P., Eidenbenz, S., Triguero, F., Morales, R., Conejo, R., Hennessy, M. (eds) Automata, Languages and Programming. ICALP 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2380. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45465-9_82

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45465-9_82

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43864-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45465-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics