Abstract
Fuzzy association rules provide a data mining tool which is especially interesting from a knowledge-representational point of view since fuzzy attribute values allow for expressing rules in terms of natural language. So far, however, association rules of this type have not been investigated thoroughly from a semantical point of view. Particularly, the quality measures which have been proposed for assessing such rules are mostly “ad-hoc” generalizations of measures for classical rules. In this paper, we show that fuzzy association rules can be interpreted in different ways and that the interpretation has a strong influence on their assessment and,hence,on the process of rule mining. We motivate the use of multiple-valued implication operators in order to model fuzzy association rules and propose quality measures suitable for this type of rule.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
R. Agrawal and S. Srikant. Fast algorithms for mining association rules. In Proceedings of the 20th Conference on VLDB Santiago, Chile, 1994.
Wai-Ho Au and K.C.C. Chan. An effective algorithm for discovering fuzzy rules in relational databases. In Proceedings IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence pages 1314–1319, 1998.
Wai-Ho Au and K.C.C. Chan. FARM: A data mining system for discovering fuzzy association rules. In Proceedings FUZZ-IEEE-99, pages 1217–1222, 1999.
K.C.C. Chan and Wai-Ho Au. Mining fuzzy association rules. In Proceedings CIKM-97, 6th Int. Conf. on Inform. and Knowl. Management, pages 10–14, 1997.
G. Chen, Q. Wei, and E.E. Kerre. Fuzzy data mining:Discovery of fuzzy generalized association rules. In G. Bordogna and G. Pasi, editors, Recent Issues on Fuzzy Databases. Springer-Verlag, 2000.
G. Chen, G. Wets, and K. Vanhoof. Representation and discovery of fuzzy association rules. Technical Report 00/01, ITEO Research Papers, 2000.
M. Delgado, D. Sanchez, and M.A. Vila. Acquisition of fuzzy association rules from medical data. In S. Barro and R. Marin, editors, Fuzzy Logic in Medicine. Physica Verlag, 2000.
D. Dubois, E. Hüllermeier, and H. Prade. Toward the representation of implicative fuzzy rules in terms of crisp rules. In Proc. IFSA/NAFIPS-2001, Vancouver, Canada, July 2001. To appear.
D. Dubois and H. Prade. What are fuzzy rules and how to use them. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 84:169–185, 1996.
D. Dubois, H. Prade, and C. Testemale. Weighted fuzzy pattern matching. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 28:313–331, 1988.
D. Dubois, H. Prade, and R.R. Yager. Merging fuzzy information. In J.C. Bezdek, D. Dubois, and H. Prade, editors, Fuzzy Sets in Approximate Reasoning and Information Systems, pages 335–401. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1999.
A. Fu, M.H. Wong, S.C. Sze, W.C. Wong, W.L. Wong, and W.K. Yu. Finding fuzzy sets for the mining of fuzzy association rules for numerical attributes. In IDEAL-98, 1st Int. Symp. on Intell. Data Engineering and Learning, pages 263–268, 1998.
A. Gyenesei. A fuzzy approach for mining quantitative association rules. Technical Report 336, Turku Centre for Computer Science, 2000.
A. Gyenesei. Mining weighted association rules for fuzzy quantitative items. Technical Report 346, Turku Centre for Computer Science, 2000.
E. Hüllermeier. Mining fuzzy association rules in databases.Submitted.
C. Man Kuok, A. Fu, and M. Hon Wong. Mining fuzzy association rules in databases. SIGMOD Record, 27:41–46, 1998.
B. Lent, A. Swami, and J. Widom. Clustering association rules.In Proceedings ICDE-97, Birmingham, UK, 1997.
A. De Luca and S. Termini. Entropy of L-fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 24:55–73, 1974.
R.J. Miller and Y. Yang. Association rules over interval data. In Proc. ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data, pages 452–461, 1997.
J.S. Park, M.S. Chen, and P.S. Yu. An efficient hash-based algorithm for mining association rules. In ACM SIGMOD Int. Conf. on Management of Data, 1995.
W. Pedrycz. Data mining and fuzzy modeling. In Proc. of the Biennial Conference of the NAFIPS, pages 263–267, Berkeley, CA, 1996.
H. Prade and R.R. Yager. Estimations of expectedness and potential surprize in possibility theory. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 2:417–428, 1994.
A. Savasere, E. Omiecinski, and S. Navathe. An efficient algorithm for mining association rules in large databases. In Proceedings VLDB-95, Zurich, 1995.
R. Skrikant and R. Agrawal. Mining quantitative association rules in large relational tables. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pages 1–12, 1996.
R.R. Yager. Aggregating evidence using quantified statements. Information Sciences, 36:179–206, 1985.
S. Ben Yahia and A. Jaoua. Mining linguistic summaries of databases using Lukasiewicz implication fuzzy functional dependency. In Proceedings FUZZ-IEEE-99 pages 1246–1250, 1999.
Y. Yang and M. Singhal. Fuzzy functional dependencies and fuzzy association rules. In Data Warehousing and Knowl edge Discovery, Proceedings DAWAK-99 pages 229–240. Springer-Verlag, 1999.
W. Zhang. Mining fuzzy quantitative association rules. In Proc. 11th IEEE Int. Conf. on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, Chicago, Illinois, 1999.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hüllermeier, E. (2001). Fuzzy Association Rules: Semantic Issues and Quality Measures. In: Reusch, B. (eds) Computational Intelligence. Theory and Applications. Fuzzy Days 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2206. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45493-4_40
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45493-4_40
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42732-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45493-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive