Skip to main content

connected Joins in Graphs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization (IPCO 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2081))

Abstract

A join in a graph is a set F of edges such that for every circuit C, |C ∩ F| ≤ |C ∖ F|. We study the problem of finding a connected join covering a given subset of vertices of the graph, that is a Steiner tree which is a join at the same time. This turns out to contain the question of finding a T-join of minimum cardinality (or weight) which is, in addition, connected. This last problem is mentioned to be open in a survey of Frank [7], and is motivated by its link to integral packings of T-cuts: if a minimum T-join F is connected, then there exists an integral packing of T-cuts of cardinality |F|.

The problems we deal with are closely related to some known NP- complete problems: deciding the existence of a connected T-join; finding the minimum cardinality of a connected T-join; the Steiner tree problem; subgraph isomorphism. We also explore some of these connections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bandelt Hans-Jürgen, “Recognition of tree metrics”, SIAM Journal of Discrete Math., 3 (1990), 1–6.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Buneman Peter, “A note on the metric properties of trees”, Journal of Combinatorial Theory (B), 17 (1974), 48–50.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cai Leizhen and Corneil Derek, “Tree Spanners”, SIAM journal of Discrete Mathematics, 8 (1995), 359–378.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Cunningham James, “Free Trees and Bidirectional Trees as Representations of Psychological distance”, Journal of mathematical psychology, 17 (1978), 165–188.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Deza Michel Marie and Laurent Monique Geometry of cuts and metrics, Springer, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Edmonds Jack and Johnson Ellis, “Matching, Euler Tours and the Chinese Postman”, Mathematical Programming, 5 (1973), 88–124.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Frank András, “A Survey on T-joins, T-cuts, and Conservative Weightings”, Combinatorics, Paul Erdős is eighty, 2 (1996), 213–252.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frank András and Szigeti Zoltán, “On packing T-cuts”, Journal of Combinatorial Theory (B), 61 (1994), 263–271.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Garey Michael and Johnson David, Computers and intractability, a Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness, Freeman, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guan Mei Gu, “Graphic programming using odd and even points”, Chinese Journal of Mathematics, 1 (1962), 273–277.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hakimi S.L. and Yau S.S., “Distance matrix of a graph and its realizability”, Quarterly Applied Mathematics, 22 (1964), 305–317.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Korach E. and Penn M., “Tight integral duality gap in the Chinese postman problem”, Mathematical Programming, 55 (1992), 183–191.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Korte Bernhard, Prömel Hans Jürgen and Steger Angelika, “Steiner trees and VLSI-layout”, Paths, Flows and VLSI-layouts, Korte, Lovász, Prömel, Schrijver, eds, Springer-Verlag, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lovász László and Plummer M. D., Matching Theory, North-Holland, Amsterdam,1986.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Middendorf M. and Pfeiffer F., “On the complexity of the edge-disjoint path problem”, Combinatorica, 8 (1998), 103–116.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Penny David, Foulds and Hendy, “Testing the theory of evolution by comparing phylognenetic trees”, Nature, 297 (1982), 197–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sebő András, “A quick proof of Seymour’s Theorem on t-joins”, Discrete Mathematics, 64 (1987), 101–103.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Sebő András, “Undirected distances and the postman-structure of graphs”, Journal of Combinatorial Theory/B, 49 (1990), No 1.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Seymour Paul, “On odd cuts and planar multicommodity flows”, Proc. London Math. Soc., 42 (1981), 178–192.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Winter Pawel, “Steiner Problem in Networks: A Survey”, Networks, 17 (1987), 129–167.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sebő, A., Tannier, E. (2001). connected Joins in Graphs. In: Aardal, K., Gerards, B. (eds) Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization. IPCO 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2081. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45535-3_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45535-3_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42225-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45535-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics