Abstract
We show that the problems of minimizing total completion time and of minimizing the number of late jobs on unrelated parallel machines, when preemption is allowed, are both NP-hard in the strong sense. The former result settles a long-standing open question.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
P. Brucker and S.A. Kravchenko: Preemption can make parallel machine scheduling problems hard, Osnabruecker Schriften zur Mathematik, Reihe P (Preprints), Heft 211, (1999).
P. Brucker, S.A. Kravchenko and Y.N. Sotskov, Preemptive job-shop scheduling problems with a fixed number of jobs, Mathematical Methods of Operations Research 49 (1999), 41–76.
J. Bruno, E.G. Coman Jr, R. Sethi, Scheduling independent tasks to reduce mean finishing time, Communications of the ACM 17 (1974), 382–387.
J. Du and J.Y.-T. Leung, Minimizing the number of late jobs on unrelated machines, Operations Research Letters 10 (1991), 153–158.
J. Du, J.Y.-T. Leung, Minimizing mean flow time with release time constraints, Theoretical Computer Science 75 (1990) 347–355.
J. Du, J.Y.-T. Leung, G.H. Young, Scheduling chain-structured tasks to minimize makespan and mean flow time, Information and Computation 92 (1991) 219–236.
Gonzalez, Optimal mean finish time preemptive schedules, Technical Report 220, Computer Science Department, Pennsylvania State University (1977).
R.L. Graham, E.L. Lawler, J.K. Lenstra, A.H.G. Rinnooy Kan, Optimization and approximation in deterministic sequencing and scheduling: a survey, Annals of Discrete Mathematics 4 (1979), 287–326.
W.A. Horn, Minimizing average flow time with parallel machines, Operations Research 21 (1973), 846–847.
R.M. Karp, Reducibility among combinatorial problems, in: R.E. Miller and J.W. Thatcher (eds.), Complexity of Computer Computations, Plenum Press, New York (1972), 85–103.
S.A. Kravchenko, Y.N. Sotskov, Optimal makespan schedule for three jobs on two machines, Mathematical Methods of Operations Research 43 (1996), 233–238.
E.L. Lawler, J. Labetoulle, On preemptive scheduling of unrelated parallel processors by linear programming, Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 25 (1978), 612–619.
E.L. Lawler, Recent results in the theory of machine scheduling, in: A. Bachem, M. Grötchel and B. Korte (eds.), Mathematical Programming: the State of the Art-Bonn 1982, Springer, Berlin-New York (1983), 202–234.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sitters, R. (2001). Two NP-hardness Results for Preemptive Minsum Scheduling of Unrelated Parallel Machines. In: Aardal, K., Gerards, B. (eds) Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization. IPCO 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2081. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45535-3_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45535-3_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42225-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45535-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive