Skip to main content

System Description: GrAnDe 1.0

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automated Deduction—CADE-18 (CADE 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2392))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 381 Accesses

Abstract

The validity problem for full first-order logic is only semi-decidable. However, there are many interesting problems that, when expressed in clause normal form, have a finite Herbrand universe. They fall into a decidable subclass of first-order logic. Traditionally, such problems have been tackled using conventional first-order techniques. Some implementations, e.g. DCTP [SL01], are decision procedures for this class of problems. An alternative approach, justified by Herbrand’s theorem, is to generate the ground instances of such a problem and use a propositional decision system to determine the satisfiability of the resulting propositional problem. The applicability of the grounding approach has led to these problems being called “effectively propositional” (EPR) problems. The TPTP problem library [SS98] v2.4.1 contains 574 EPR problems. Many of these are group theory problems (101 problems) and CNF translations of formulae in propositional multi-modal logic (206 problems).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. DIMACS. Satisfiability Suggested Format. ftp://dimacs.rutgers.edu/ pub/challenge/satisfiability/doc/satformat.tex.

  2. H. Hoos and T. Stützle. SATLIB: An Online Resource for Research on SAT. In I. Gent, H. van Maaren, and T. Walsh, editors, Proc. of the 3rd Workshop on the Satisfiability Problem, 2001. http://www.satlib.org/.

  3. S-J. Lee and D.A. Plaisted. Eliminating Duplication with the Hyper-Linking Strategy. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 9(1):25–42, 1992.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Moskewicz, C. Madigan, Y. Zhao, L. Zhang, and S. Malik. Chaff: Engineering an Efficient SAT Solver. In D. Blaauw and L. Lavagno, editors, Proc. of the 39th Design Automation Conference, pages 530–535, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D.A. Plaisted and Y. Zhu. Ordered Semantic Hyper-linking. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 25(3):167–217, 2000.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Riazanov and A. Voronkov. Vampire. In H. Ganzinger, editor, Proc. of the 16th International Conference on Automated Deduction, number 1632 in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 292–296. Springer, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Riazanov and A. Voronkov. Splitting without Backtracking. In B. Nebel, editor, Proc. of the 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 611–617. Morgan Kaufmann, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Schulz. A Comparison of Different Techniques for Grounding Near-Propositional CNF Formulae. In S. Haller and G. Simmons, editors, Proc. of the 15th Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Symposium. AAAI Press, 2002. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. Stenz and R. Letz. DCTP-A Disconnection Calculus Theorem Prover. In R. Gore, A. Leitsch, and T. Nipkow, editors, Proc. of the International Joint Conference on Automated Reasoning, number 2083 in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 381–385. Springer, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Sutcliffe and C.B. Suttner. The TPTP Problem Library: CNF Release v1.2.1. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 21(2):177–203, 1998.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. G. Sutcliffe, C. Suttner, and J. Pelletier. The IJCAR ATP System Competition. Journal of Automated Reasoning, To appear, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Sutcliffe. CASC-JC. http://www.cs.miami.edu/ tptp/CASC/JC/, 2001.

  13. C. Weidenbach, et al. SPASS Version 1.0.0. In H. Ganzinger, editor, Proc. of the 16th International Conference on Automated Deduction, number 1632 in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 378–382. Springer, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Zhang and M. Stickel. Implementing the Davis-Putnam Method. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 24(1/2):277–296, 2000.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Schulz, S., Sutcliffe, G. (2002). System Description: GrAnDe 1.0. In: Voronkov, A. (eds) Automated Deduction—CADE-18. CADE 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2392. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45620-1_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45620-1_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43931-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45620-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics