Abstract
Most approaches to modelling agent interactions tend to focus just on the mechanism: the protocol and language used for the interaction, and forget the context where that interaction takes place. We hold that although the complexity of the problem to be solved is associated to the complexity of the mechanism, modelling the mechanism alone is insufficient. We argue that an appropriate representation of the context and pragmatics associated to the interaction, as well as a practical way of enforcing the accepted interaction conventions are essential for the design of successful MAS applications. The concept of Electronic Institution is presented both as a way to reconcile mechanisms with their corresponding pragmatic and contextual aspects, and a way of extending familiar notions of mediation to MAS.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J. L. Austin. How to Do Things With Words. Oxford University Press, 1962.
C. Castelfranchi, F. Dignum, C. Jonker, and J. Treur. Deliberate Normative Agents: Principles and Architectures, pages 364–378. Intelligent Agents VI (LNAI-1757). N. Jennings and Y. Lesperance (eds.). Springer-Verlag, 2000.
M. Esteva and C. Sierra. ISLANDER1.0 Language Definition. Technical report, IIIA-CSIC, 2001.
Marc Esteva, David de la Cruz, and Carles Sierra. ISLANDER: an electronic institutions editor. In AAMAS’02, page in press. ACM Press, 2002.
P. Faratin, C. Sierra, and N. R. Jennings. Using similarity criteria to make negotiation trade-offs. In Proc. Fourth Int. Conf. on Multi-Agent Systems, ICMAS’00, pages 119–126, 2000.
Michael R. Genesereth and Richard E. Fikes. Knowldege interchange format version 3.0 reference manual. Technical Report Report Logic-92-1, Logic Group, Computer Science Department, Standford University, June 1992.
N. R. Jennings, P. Faratin, A. R. Lomuscio, S. Parsons, M. Wooldridge, and C. Sierra. Automated negotiation: Prospects, methods and challenges. Group Decision and Negotiation, 10:199–215, 2001.
N. R. Jennings, P. Faratin, T. J. Norman, P. O’Brien, and B. Odgers. Autonomous agents for business process management. Int. Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence., 14(2):145–189, 2000.
M. Karlins and H. I. Abelson. Persuasion. Crosby Lockwood & Son, London, UK, 1970.
B. Laasri, H. Laasri, S. Lander, and V. Lesser. A generic model for negotiating agents. International journal of Intelligent and Cooperative Information Systems, 1(2):291–317, 1992.
R. P. McAfee and J. McMillan. Auctions and bidding. Journal of Economic Literature, XXV:699–738, 1987.
P. Noriega and C. Sierra. Auctions and multi-agent systems. In Matthias Klusch, editor, Intelligent Information Agents, pages 153–175. Springer, 1999.
Pablo Noriega. Agent-Mediated Auctions: The Fishmarket Metaphor. Number 8 in IIIA Monograph Series. Institut d’Investigació en Intel.ligència Artificial (IIIA), 1997. PhD Thesis.
Pablo Noriega and Carles Sierra. Towards layered dialogical agents. In Third International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, ATAL-96, 1996.
Douglas C. North. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economics Perfomance. Cambridge U. P., 1990.
P. Panzarasa, T. J. Norman, and N. R. Jennings. Social mental shaping: modelling the impact of sociality on autonomous agents’ mental states. Computational Intelligence, 2001.
N. Rescher. Dialectics: A controversy-oriented approach to the theory of knowledge. SUNY, 1977.
Juan A. Rodríguez-Aguilar, Francisco J. Martín, Pablo Noriega, Pere Garcia, and Carles Sierra. Towards a test-bed for trading agents in electronic auction markets. AI Communications, 11(1):5–19, 1998.
Juan Antonio Rodriguez-Aguilar. On the design and construction of Agent-mediated Institutions. Number 14 in Monografies de l’IIIA. IIIA-CSIC, 2002.
L. Royakkers and F. Dignum. Organisations and collective obligations. In 11th International Conference on Databases & Expert Systems Applications (LNCS-1873), pages 302–311. Springer-Verlag, 2000.
N. Sadeh-Koniecpol, D. Hildum, D. Kjensta, and A. Tseng. Mascot: An agent-based architecture for coordinated mixed-initiative supply chain planning and scheduling. In Workshop notes, Agent-Based Decision Support for Managing the Internet-Enabled Supply Chain, Third International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents’ 99), 1999.
J. R. Searle. Speech acts. Cambridge U.P., 1969.
C. Sierra, P. Faratin, and N. R. Jennings. A service-oriented negotiation model between autonomous agents. In MAAMAW’97, number 1237 in LNAI, pages 17–35, Ronneby, Sweden, 1997.
C. Sierra, N. R. Jennings, P. Noriega, and S. Parsons. A framework for argumentation-based negotiation. In Intelligent Agents IV, pages 177–192, 1997.
Vernon L. Smith. Auctions, pages 39–53. The new Palgrave: a dictionary of Economics. John Eatwell, Murray Milgate and Peter Newman (eds). McMillan, London, 1987.
K. P. Sycara. Persuasive argumentation in negotiation. Theory and Decision, 28:203–242, 1990.
G. H. von Wright. Deontic logic. Mind, (60):1–15, 1951.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sierra, C., Noriega, P. (2002). Agent-Mediated Interaction. From Auctions to Negotiation and Argumentation. In: d’Inverno, M., Luck, M., Fisher, M., Preist, C. (eds) Foundations and Applications of Multi-Agent Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2403. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45634-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45634-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43962-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45634-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive