Skip to main content

Postdiction Problems in Dynamic Logic

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
AI 2001: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2256))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 732 Accesses

Abstract

We present a framework for backward and forward temporal projection that combines dynamic and temporal logic. A propositional dynamic logic for reasoning about actions is extended with temporal modalities; the syntax of this extension differs from the syntax of the converse of programs, previously understood as backwards modalities. An application is carried out to benchmark postdiction examples such as the Stanford Murder Mystery [1] and the Two-Buses Problem [8]. A method for automatically generating frame axioms is used; the axioms so generated are treated as supplementary axioms in the associated proof theory. In future work, we hope to embed this system into a more comprehensive logic for reasoning about actions that enables a unified treatment of the frame, qualification and ramification problems and to work with more ‘scaled-up’ examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A.B Baker. Nonmonotonic reasoning in the framework of the situation calculus. Artificial Intelligence, 49:5–23, 1991.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. M.A. Castilho, O. Gasquet, and A. Herzig. Formalizing action and change in modal logic I:the frame problem. Journal of Logic and Computations, 9:701–735, 1999.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. N. Foo and D. Zhang. Dealing with the ramification problem in the extended propositional dynamic logic. In Proceedings of Advances in Modal Logic, pages 89–102, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. Foo and D. Zhang. Reasoning with extra frame axioms and qualification axioms manuscript. available at http://ftp.cse.unsw.edu.au/pub/users/ksg/Working/action3.zip, 2000.

  5. R. Goldblatt. Logics of Time and Computation. Stanford University Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Hanks and D. McDermott. Nonmonotonic logic and temporal projection. Artificial Intelligence, 33(3):379–412, 1987.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. D. Harel. First-order dynamic logic. Springer-Verlag, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G.N. Kartha. Two counterexamples related to baker’ s approach to the frame problem. Artificial Intelligence, 69:379–391, 1994.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. H. Kautz. A first order dynamic logic for planning. In Proceedings of the CSCSI/SCEIO, pages 19–26, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. McCarthy. Circumscription-a form of nonmonotonic reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 13, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rohit Parikh. The completeness of propositional dynamic logic. In Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Number 64, pages 403–415. Springer-Verlag, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Pinto and R. Reiter. reasoning about time in the situation calculus. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 14(2–4):251–268, Sept 1995.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Pnueli. The temporal semantics of concurrent programs. Theoretical Computer Science, 13:45–60, 1981.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. V.R. Pratt. Semantical considerations on floyd-hoare logic. In Proceedings of the 17th IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 109–121, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  15. H. Prendinger and G. Schurz. Reasoning about action and change: A dynamic logic approach. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, 5:209–245, 1996.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Rosenschein. Plan synthesis:a logical approach. In IJCAI-81, pages 359–380, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Murray Shanahan. Solving the Frame Problem: a mathematical investigation of the common sense law of inertia. MIT Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Shoham. Chronological ignorance: experiments in nonmonotonic temporal reasoning. Artificial Intelligence, 36:279–331, 1988.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. D. Zhang and N. Foo. EPDL: A logic for causal reasoning. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence-IJCAI-2001, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chopra, S., Zhang, D. (2001). Postdiction Problems in Dynamic Logic. In: Stumptner, M., Corbett, D., Brooks, M. (eds) AI 2001: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AI 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2256. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45656-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45656-2_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42960-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45656-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics