Skip to main content

Solving the Ramification Problem: Causal Propagation in an Argumentation-Theoretic Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
PRICAI 2002: Trends in Artificial Intelligence (PRICAI 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2417))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, we further develop a framework for reasoning about action. We show how the proposed formalism copes with complex action domains in the presence of indirect effects. Furthermore, we also introduce an alternative representation of dynamic systems that enables the proposed formalism to deal with sophisticated problems. We consider this to be the intermediate level between common-sense knowledge and scientific knowledge.

This work was performed while the first author was at the School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of New South Wales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Bondarenko, Phan M. Dung, Robert A. Kowalski, and Francesca Toni. An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning. AIJ, 93:63–101, 1997.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. T. Drakengren and M. Bjäreland. Reasoning about action in polynomial time. AIJ, 115:1–24, 1999.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Fangzhen Lin. Embracing causality in specifying the indirect effects of actions. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Norman McCain and Hudson Turner. A causal theory of ramifications and qualifications. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Norman McCain and Hudson Turner. Causal theories of action and change. In National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 460–465, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eric Sandewall. Features and Fluents. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Michael Thielscher. Ramification and causality. AIJ, 89:317–364, 1997.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Quoc Bao Vo. M eta-Constructs and Their Roles in Common Sense Reasoning. PhD thesis, School of Computer Science and Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, 2001. Submitted.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Quoc Bao Vo and Norman Y. Foo. Solving the qualification problem (in the presence of the frame problem). In Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 519–531, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vo, Q.B., Foo, N.Y. (2002). Solving the Ramification Problem: Causal Propagation in an Argumentation-Theoretic Approach. In: Ishizuka, M., Sattar, A. (eds) PRICAI 2002: Trends in Artificial Intelligence. PRICAI 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2417. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45683-X_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45683-X_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44038-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45683-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics