Skip to main content

Identifying Arbitrage Opportunities in e-Markets

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
E-Commerce and Web Technologies (EC-Web 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2455))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 795 Accesses

Abstract

A market is in equilibrium if there is no opportunity for arbitrage, ie: risk-free, or low-risk, profit. The majority of real markets are not in equilibrium. A project is investigating the market evolutionary process in a particular electronic market that has been constructed in an on-going collaborative research project between a university and a software house. The way in which actors (buyers, sellers and others) use the market will be influenced by the information available to them. In this experiment, data mining and filtering techniques are used to distil both individual signals drawn from the markets and signals from the Internet into meaningful advice for the actors. The goal of this experiment is first to learn how actors will use the advice available to them to identify arbitrage opportunities, and second how the market will evolve through entrepreneurial intervention. In this electronic market a multiagent process management system is used to manage all market transactions including those that drive the market evolutionary process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Israel M. Kirzner “Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach” Journal of Economic Literature XXXV (March) 1997 60–85.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bjork, Tomas. Arbitrage Theory in Continuous Time. Oxford University Press (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar, M. & Feldman, S.I. Business Negotiations on the Internet. Proceedings INET’98 Internet Summit, Geneva, July 21–24, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bichler, M. The Future of E-Commerce: Multi-Dimensional Market Mechanisms. Cambridge University Press (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Milgrom, P. Auction Theory for Privatization. Cambridge Univ Press (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bulow, J. & Klemperer, P. Auctions Versus Negotiations. American Economic Review, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Guttman, A. Moukas, and P. Maes. Agent-mediated Electronic Commerce: A Survey. Knowledge Engineering Review, June 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Moshe Tennenholtz. Electronic Commerce: From Economic and Game-Theoretic Models to Working Protocols. Invited paper. Proceedings Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI’99, Stockholm, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sandholm, T. Agents in Electronic Commerce: Component Technologies for Automated Negotiation and Coalition Formation. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 3(1), 73–96.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ströbel, M. Design of Roles and Protocols for Electronic Negotiations. Electronic Commerce Research Journal, Special Issue on Market Design 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Peyman Faratin. Automated Service Negotiation Between Autonomous Computational Agents. PhD dissertation, University of London (Dec 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Wise & D. Morrison. Beyond the Exchange; The Future of B2B. Harvard Business review Nov–Dec 2000, pp86–96.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kaplan, Steven and Sawhney, Mohanbir. E-Hubs: The New B2B Marketplace. Harvard Business Review 78 May–June 2000 97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Neeman, Z. & Vulkan, N. Markets Versus Negotiations. The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Discussion Paper 239. (February 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. Kovalerchuk & E. Vityaev. Data Mining in Finance: Advances in Relational and Hybrid Methods. Kluwer, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Han, L.V.S. Lakshmanan & R.T. Ng. Constraint-based multidimensional data mining. IEEE Computer, 8, 46–50, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Han, J. & Kamber, M. Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chen, Z. Computational Intelligence for Decision Support. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Feldman, S. Technology Trends and Drivers and a Vision of the Future of e-business. Proceedings 4th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, September 25–28, 2000, Makuhari, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fischer, L. (Ed). Workflow Handbook 2001. Future Strategies, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Debenham, J.K.. Supporting knowledge-driven processes in a multiagent process management system. Proceedings Twentieth International Conference on Knowledge Based Systems and Applied Artificial Intelligence, ES’2000: Research and Development in Intelligent Systems XVII, Cambridge UK, December 2000, pp273–286.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jain, A.K., Aparicio, M. and Singh, M.P. “Agents for Process Coherence in Virtual Enterprises” in Communications of the ACM, Volume 42, No 3, March 1999, pp62–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jennings, N.R., Faratin, P., Norman, T.J., O’Brien, P. & Odgers, B. Autonomous Agents for Business Process Management. Int. Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence 14 (2) 145–189, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Robert Skinstad, R. “Business process integration through XML”. In proceedings XML Europe 2000, Paris, 12–16 June 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Guarino N., Masolo C., and Vetere G., OntoSeek: Content-Based Access to the Web, IEEE Intelligent Systems 14(3), May/June 1999, pp. 70–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Uschold, M. and Gruninger, M.: 1996, Ontologies: principles, methods and applications. Knowledge Engineering Review, 11(2), 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Müller, J.P. “The Design of Intelligent Agents” Springer-Verlag, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rao, A.S. and Georgeff, M.P. “BDI Agents: From Theory to Practice”, in proceedings First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS-95), San Francisco, USA, pp 312–319.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Finin, F. Labrou, Y., and Mayfield, J. “KQML as an agent communication language.” In Jeff Bradshaw (Ed.) Software Agents. MIT Press (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Reverre, S. “The Complete Arbitrage Deskbook.” McGraw-Hill, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hull, JC. “Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives.” Prentice-Hall, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Debenham, J. (2002). Identifying Arbitrage Opportunities in e-Markets. In: Bauknecht, K., Tjoa, A.M., Quirchmayr, G. (eds) E-Commerce and Web Technologies. EC-Web 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2455. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45705-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45705-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44137-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45705-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics