Abstract
We consider the setting of a web server that receives requests for documents from clients, and returns the requested documents over a multicast/broadcast channel. We compare the quality of service (QoS) obtainable by optimal schedules under various models of the capabilities of the server and the clients to send and receive segments of a document out of order. We show that allowing the server to send segments out of order does not improve any reasonable QoS measure. However, the ability of the clients to receive data out of order can drastically improve the achievable QoS under some, but not all, reasonable/common QoS measures.
Supported in part by NSF grant CCR-0098752, NSF grant ANIR-0123705, and by a grant from the US Air Force.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. Aacharya, and S. Muthukrishnan, “Scheduling on-demand broadcasts: new metrics and algorithms”, ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, 1998.
A. Bar-Noy, R. Bhatia, J. Naor, and B. Schieber, “Minimizing service and operation costs of periodic scheduling”, 11–20, SODA 1998.
Y. Bartal, and S. Muthukrishnan, “Minimizing maximum response time in scheduling broadcasts”, 558–559, SODA, 2000.
Digital Fountain website, http://www.digitalfountain.com.
DirecPC website, http://www.direcpc.com.
J. Edmonds and K. Pruhs, “Broadcast scheduling: when fairness is fine”, SODA,2002.
T. Erlebach and A. Hall, “Hardness of broadcast scheduling and inapproximability of single-source unsplittable min-cost flow”, SODA, 2002.
R. Gandhi, S. Khuller, Y.A. Kim, and Y.C. Wan, “Algorithms for Minimimzing Response Time in Broadcast Scheduling”, To appear in IPCO, 2002.
B. Kalyanasundaram, and K. Pruhs, “Speed is as powerful as clairvoyance”, JACM, 2000.
B. Kalyanasundaram, K. Pruhs, and M. Velauthapillai, “Scheduling broadcasts in wireless networks”, European Symposium on Algorithms (ESA), 2000.
C. Kenyon, N. Schabanel and N. Young, “Polynomial-time approximation schemes for data broadcast”, 659–666, STOC 2000.
J. Kurose and K. Ross, Computer Networking: A Top Down Approach Featuring the Internet, Addison Wesley Longman, 2001.
C. Phillips, C. Stein, E. Torng, and J. Wein “Optimal time-critical scheduling via resource augmentation”, ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 140–149, 1997.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pruhs, K., Uthaisombut, P. (2002). A Comparison of Multicast Pull Models. In: Möhring, R., Raman, R. (eds) Algorithms — ESA 2002. ESA 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2461. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45749-6_70
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45749-6_70
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44180-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45749-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive