Skip to main content

On the Power of Priority Algorithms for Facility Location and Set Cover

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Approximation Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimization (APPROX 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2462))

Abstract

We apply and extend the priority algorithm framework introduced by Borodin, Nielsen and Rackoff to define “greedy-like” algorithms for (uncapacitated) facility location and set cover. These problems have been the focus of extensive research from the point of view of approximation algorithms, and for both problems greedy algorithms have been proposed and analyzed. The priority algorithm definitions are general enough so as to capture a broad class of algorithms that can be characterized as “greedy-like” while still possible to derive non-trivial lower bounds on the approximability of the problems. Our results are orthogonal to complexity considerations, and hence apply to algorithms that are not necessarily polynomial-time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Borodin, M. Nielsen, and C. Rackoff. (Incremental) priority algorithms. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 752–761, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Charikar, C. Chekuri, T. Feder, and M. Motwani. Incremental clustering and dynamic information retrieval. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 626–634, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. Chvátal. A greedy heuristic for the set covering problem. Mathematics of Operations Research, 4(3):233–235, 1979.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. U. Feige. A threshold of ln n for approximating set cover. Journal of the ACM, 45(4):634–652, 1998.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Guha and S. Khuller. Greedy strikes back: Improved facility location algorithms. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 649–657, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Hochbaum. Heuristics for the fixed cost median problem. Mathematical Programming, 22:148–162, 1982.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. K. Jain, M. Mahdian, and A. Saberi. A new greedy approach for facility location problems. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computation, pages 731–740, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D.S. Johnson. Approximation algorithms for combinatorial problems. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 9(3):256–278, 1974.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. L. Lovász. On the ratio of optimal integral and fractional covers. Discrete Mathematics, 13:383–390, 1975.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. M. Mahdian, E. Markakis, A. Saberi, and V. V. Vazirani. A greedy facility location algorithm analyzed using dual fitting. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Approximation Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimization Problems (APPROX), pages 127–137, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Mahdian, J. Ye, and J. Zhang. A 1.52-approximation algorithm for the uncapacitated facility location problem. Available at http://www.mit.edu/~mahdian/pub.html.

  12. R. R. Mettu and C. G. Plaxton. The online median problem. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 339–348, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Meyerson. Online facility location. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pages 426–431, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D.B. Shmoys. Approximation algorithms for facility location problems. In K. Jansen and S. Khuller, editors, Approximation Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimization, volume 1913 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, Berlin, 2000.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. D.B. Shmoys, E. Tardos, and K. Aardal. Approximation algorithms for facility location problems (extended abstract). In Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 265–274, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. Slavík. A tight analysis of the greedy algorithm for set cover. Journal of Algorithms, 25:237–254, 1997.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Angelopoulos, S., Borodin, A. (2002). On the Power of Priority Algorithms for Facility Location and Set Cover. In: Jansen, K., Leonardi, S., Vazirani, V. (eds) Approximation Algorithms for Combinatorial Optimization. APPROX 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2462. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45753-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45753-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44186-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45753-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics