Abstract
This study examines BDI logics in the context of Gabbay’s fibring semantics. We show that dovetailing (a special form of fibring) can be adopted as a semantic methodology to combine BDI logics. We develop a set of interaction axioms that can capture static as well as dynamic aspects of the mental states in BDI systems, using Catach’s incestual schema G a,b,c,d. Further we exemplify the constraints required on fibring function to capture the semantics of interactions among modalities. The advantages of having a fibred approach is discussed in the final section.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
M.E. Bratman, D.J. Israel, and M.E Pollack. Plans and resource-bounded practical reasoning. Computational Intelligence, 4:349–355, 1988.
L. Catach. Normal multimodal logics. In In Proc. National Conference on AI(AAAI-88), pages 491–495, 1988.
P. R. Cohen and H. J. Levesque. Intention is choice with commitment. Artificial Intelligence, 42(3), 1990.
K. Fischer and Muller J. P. & Pischel M. A pragmatic BDI architecture. In Intelligent Agents II, LNAI-1037, volume 1037, pages 203–218. Springer-Verlag, 1996.
D. M. Gabbay and G. Governatori. Dealing with label dependent deontic modalities. In Norms, Logics And Information Systems. IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1999.
D. M. Gabbay. Fibring Logics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998.
M. George. and F. Ingrand. Decision making in an embedded reasoning system. In In proc. of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence-IJCAI, pages 972–978, 1989.
M. Kracht and F. Wolter. Properties of independently axiomatizable bimodal logics. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 56(4):1469–1485, 1991.
M. Kracht. Tools and Techniques for Modal Logics. Elsevier, 1999.
E.J. Lemmon. Algebraic semantics for modal logic II. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 31:191–218, June 1966.
Franz Baader & Carsten Lutz, Holger Sturn, and Frank Wolter. Fusions of description logics and abstract description systems. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 16:1–58, 2002.
Lin Padgham and Patrick Lambrix. Agent capabilities: Extending bdi theory. In Proccedings of AAAI-2000, Austin, Texas, USA, pages 68–73. AAAI/MIT Press, 2000.
Vineet Padmanabhan, Guido Governatori, and Abdul Sattar. Actions made explicit in BDI. In AI 2001: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, LNAI-2256. Springer Verlag, 2001.
A.S. Rao and George. M.P. Modelling rational agents within a bdi-architecture. In Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’91). Morgan Kaufmann, 1991.
A. S. Rao. Decision procedures for propositional linear-time belief-desire-intention logics. In Intelligent Agents Volume II, LNAI-1037, pages 33–48. Springer-Verlag, 1996.
Y. Shoham. Agent oriented programming. Artificial Intelligence, 60:51–92, 1993.
Munindar P. Singh. Semantical considerations on intention dynamics for bdi agents. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 1998.
B. Van Linder. Modal Logic for Rational Agents. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, Utrecht University, 19th June 1996.
Frank Wolter. Fusions of modal logics revisited. In Advances in Modal Logic, volume 1. CSLI Lecture notes 87, 1997.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Governatori, G., Padmanabhan, V., Sattar, A. (2002). On Fibring Semantics for BDI Logics. In: Flesca, S., Greco, S., Ianni, G., Leone, N. (eds) Logics in Artificial Intelligence. JELIA 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2424. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45757-7_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45757-7_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44190-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45757-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive