Skip to main content

Paraconsistent Logic Programs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2424))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We propose a framework which extends Antitonic Logic Programs [2] to an arbitrary complete bilattice of truth-values, where belief and doubt are explicitly represented. Based on Fitting’s ideas, this framework allows a precise definition of important operators found in logic programming such as explicit negation and the default negation. In particular, it leads to a natural integration of explicit negation with the default negation through the coherence principle [19]. According to this principle, the explicit negation entails the default negation. We then define Coherent Answer Sets, and the Paraconsistent Well-founded Model semantics, generalizing paraconsistent semantics for logic programs (for instance, WFSX p [4]). Our framework is an extension of important classes of Antitonic Logic Programs, and is general enough to capture Probabilistic Deductive Databases, Possibilistic Logic Programming, Hybrid Probabilistic Logic Programs, and Fuzzy Logic Programming. Thus, we have a powerful mathematical formalism for dealing with default reasoning, paraconsistency, and uncertainty.

João Alcântara is a PhD student supported by CAPES - Brasília, Brazil. The authors also thank the TARDE and FLUX projects, sponsored by MCT - Portugal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Alcântara, C. V. Damásio, and L. M. Pereira. Paraconsistent logic programs. Workshop on Paraconsistent Logic (WoPaLo), 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. C. V. Damásio and L. M. Pereira. Antitonic logic programs. In T. Eiter and M. Truszczynski, editors, Procs. of the 6th Int. Conf. on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR’01), LNCS/LNAI, pages 748–759. Springer, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. V. Damásio and L. M. Pereira. Monotonic and residuated logic programs. In S. Benferhat and P. Besnard, editors, 6th European Conf. on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU’01), LNCS/LNAI. Springer, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. V. Damásio. Paraconsistent Extended Logic Programming with Constraints. PhD thesis, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Dekhtyar and V. S. Subrahmanian. Hybrid probabilistic programs. Journal of Logic Programming, 43(3):197–250, 2000.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. D. Dubois, J. Lang, and H. Prade. Towards possibilistic logic programming. In Proc. of ICLP’91, pages 581–598. MIT Press, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Fitting. Logic programming on a topological bilattice. Fundamentae Mathematicae, XI:209–218, 1988.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Fitting. Bilattices and the semantics of logic programming. The Journal of Logic Programming, 11:91–116, 1991.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Gelfond and V. Lifschitz. The stable model semantics for logic programming. In R. Kowalski and K. A. Bowen, editors, 5th International Conference on Logic Programming, pages 1070–1080. MIT Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Gelfond and V. Lifschitz. Logic programs with classical negation. In Warren and Szeredi, editors, 7th International Conference on Logic Programming, pages 579–597. MIT Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Ginsberg. Multivalued logics: A uniform approach to reasoning in artificial intelligence. Computational Intelligence, 4:265–316, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Kifer and V. S. Subrahmanian. Theory of generalized annotated logic programming and its applications. The Journal of Logic Programming, 12(1, 2, 3 & 4):335–367, 1992.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Kowalski and F. Sadri. Logic programs with exceptions. In Warren and Szeredi, editors, 7th International Conference on Logic Programming. MIT Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. L. Lakshmanan and F. Sadri. On a theory of probabilistic deductive databases. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 1(1):5–42, 2001.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. L. Lakshmanan and N. Shiri. A parametric approach to deductive databases with uncertainty. Knowledge and Data Engineering, 13(4):554–570, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Maluszynski and A. Vitória. Towards rough datalog: embedding rough sets in prolog. In A. Skowron Accepted in: S. K. Pal, L. Polkowski, editor, Rough-Neuro Computing, AI Series. Springer-Verlag, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. Ng and V. S. Subrahmanian. Probabilistic logic programming. INFCTRL: Information and Computation (formerly Information and Control), 101, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Z. Pawlak. Rough Sets. Theoretical aspects of reasoning about data. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1991.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. L. M. Pereira and J. J. Alferes. Well-founded semantics for logic programs with explicit negation. In B. Neumann, editor, European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 102–106, Wien-Austria, 1992. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  20. E. Shapiro. Logic programs with uncertainties: A tool for implementing expert systems. In Proc. IJCAI’83, pages 529–532. William Kauffmann, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. van Emden and R. Kowalski. The semantics of predicate logic as a programming language. Journal of ACM, 4(23):733–742, 1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. M. van Emden. Quantitative deduction and its fixpoint theory. Journal of Logic Programming, 3(1):37–53, 1986.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. P. Vojtás and L. Paulík. Soundness and completeness of non-classical extended SLD-resolution. In Proc. of the Ws. on Extensions of Logic Programming (ELP’96), LNCS 1050, pages 289–301. Springer-Verlag, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  24. G. Wagner. A database needs two kinds of negation. In B. Thalheim, J. Demetrovics, and H-D. Gerhardt, editors, Mathematical Foundations of Database Systems, pages 357–371. LNCS 495, Springer-Verlag, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Alcântara, J., Damásio, C.V., Pereira, L.M. (2002). Paraconsistent Logic Programs. In: Flesca, S., Greco, S., Ianni, G., Leone, N. (eds) Logics in Artificial Intelligence. JELIA 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2424. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45757-7_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45757-7_29

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44190-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45757-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics