Abstract
In this article, we characterize in terms of analytic tableaux the repairs of inconsistent relational databases, that is databases that do not satisfy a given set of integrity constraints. For this purpose we provide closing and opening criteria for branches in tableaux that are built for database instances and their integrity constraints. We use the tableaux based characterization as a basis for consistent query answering, that is for retrieving from the database answers to queries that are consistent wrt the integrity constraints.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
M. Arenas, L. Bertossi and J. Chomicki. Consistent Query Answers in Inconsistent Databases. Proc. ACM Symposium on Principles of Database Systems (ACM PODS’99), 1999, pp. 68–79.
M. Arenas, L. Bertossi and J. Chomicki. Scalar Aggregation in FD-Inconsistent Databases. In Database Theory-ICDT 2001 (Proc. International Conference on Database Theory, ICDT’2001). Springer LNCS 1973, 2001, pp. 39–53.
L. Bertossi and C. Schwind. An Analytic Tableaux based Characterization of Database Repairs for Consistent Query Answering (preliminary report). In Working Notes of the IJCAI’01 Workshop on Inconsistency in Data and Knowledge, AAAI Press, 2001, pp. 95–106.
E. W. Beth. The Foundations of Mathematics. North Holland, 1959.
F. Bry. Query Answering in Information Systems with Integrity Constraints. In Proc. IFIP WG 11.5 Working Conference on Integrity and Control in Information Systems, Chapman & Hall, 1997.
A. Celle and L. Bertossi. Querying Inconsistent Databases: Algorithms and Implementation. In ‘Computational Logic-CL 2000’, J. Lloyd et al. (eds.). Stream: 6th International Conference on Rules and Objects in Databases (DOOD’2000). Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1861, Springer 2000, pp. 942–956.
L. Cholvy. A General Framework for Reasoning about Contradictory Information and some of its Applications. In Proceedings of ECAI Workshop “Conflicts among Agents”, Brighton, England, August 1998.
M. Fitting. First Order Modal Tableaux. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 4(2), 191–213, 1988.
M. Fitting. First Order Logic and Automated Theorem Proving. Texts and Monographs in Computer Science. Springer Verlag, 1990.
G. Gottlob. Complexity results for nonmonotonic logics. Journal of Logic and Computation, 2(3), 1992.
E. Lafon and C. B. Schwind. A Theorem Prover for Action Performance. In Y. Kodratoff, editor, Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 541–546. Pitman Publishing, 1988.
R. Reiter. Towards a Logical Reconstruction of Relational Database Theory. In ‘On Conceptual Modeling’, Brodie, M. L. and Mylopoulos, J. and Schmidt, J. W. (eds.), Springer-Verlag, 1984, pp. 191–233.
R. Reiter. A Sound and Sometimes Complete Query Evaluation Algorithm for Relational Databases with Null Values. Journal of the ACM, 33(2): 349–370, 1986.
C. B. Schwind. A Tableau-based Theorem Prover for a Decidable Subset of Default Logic. In M. E. Stickel, editor, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automated Deduction, number 449 in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 541–546. Springer Verlag, July 1990.
C. B. Schwind and V. Risch. Tableau-based Characterisation and Theorem Proving for Default Logic. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 13(4):223–242, 1994.
R. M. Smullyan. First Order Logic. Springer, 1968.
M. Winslett. Reasoning about Action with a Possible Models Approach. In Proceedings of the 8th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 89–93, 1988.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bertossi, L., Schwind, C. (2002). Analytic Tableaux and Database Repairs: Foundations. In: Eiter, T., Schewe, KD. (eds) Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems. FoIKS 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2284. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45758-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45758-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43220-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45758-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive