Abstract
We present a fully automated highly efficient technique which detects the multiple structural alignments of protein structures. Our method, MultiProt, finds the common geometrical cores between the input molecules. To date, only few methods were developed to tackle the structural multiple alignment problem. Most of them require that all the input molecules be aligned, while our method does not require that all the input molecules participate in the alignment. Actually, it efficiently detects high scoring partial multiple alignments for all possible number of molecules from the input. To demonstrate the power of the presented method we provide a number of experimental results performed by the implemented program. Along with the known multiple alignments of protein structures, we present new multiple structural alignment results of protein families from the All beta proteins class in the SCOP classification.
To whom correspondence should be addressed
The publisher or recipient acknowledges right of the U.S. Government to retain a nonexclusive, royalty-free license in and to any copyright covering the article.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
T. Akutsu and M. M. Halldorson. On the approximation of largest common subtrees and largest common point sets. Theoretical Computer Science, 233:33–50, 2000.
D. Bashford, C. Chothia, and A.M. Lesk. Determinants of a protein fold. Unique features of the globin amino acid sequences. J Mol Biol., 196(1):199–216, 1987.
M. de Berg, M. van Kreveld, M. Overmars, and O. Schwarzkopf. Computational Geometry-Algorithms and Applications. Springer-Verlag, 2000.
Alon Efrat, Alon Itai, and Matthew J. Katz. Geometry helps in bottleneck matching and related problems. Algorithmica, 31(1):1–28, 2001.
I. Eidhammer, I. Jonassen, and WR. Taylor. Structure Comparison and Structure Patterns. J Comput Biol., 7(5):685–716, 2000.
D. Fischer, A. Elofsson, D. Rice, and D. Eisenberg. Assessing the performance of fold recognition methods by means of a comprehensive benchmark. In L. Hunter and T. Klein, editors, In Proc. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, Singapore, 1996. World Scientific Press.
D. Fischer, S. L. Lin, H.J. Wolfson, and R. Nussinov. A Geometry-based Suite of Molecular Docking Processes. J. Mol. Biol., 248:459–477, 1995.
D. Gusfield. Algorithms on Strings, Trees, and Sequences: Computer Science and Computational Biology. Cambridge University Press, 1997.
L. Holm and C. Sander. Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J. Mol. Biol., 233(1):123–38, 1993.
W. Kabsch. A solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Crystallogr., A32:922–923, 1978.
TK. Kaindl and B. Steipe. Metric properties of the root-mean-square deviation of vector sets. Acta Cryst., A53:809, 1997.
N. Leibowitz, Z.Y. Fligelman, R. Nussinov, and H.J. Wolfson. Automated multiple structure alignment and detection of a common substructural motif. Proteins, 43(3):235–45, 2001.
N. Leibowitz, R. Nussinov, and H.J. Wolfson. MUSTA-a general, efficient, automated method for multiple structure alignment and detection of common motifs: application to proteins. J Comput Biol., 8(2):93–121, 2001.
C. Lemmen and T. Lengauer. Computational methods for the structural alignment of molecules. J Comput Aided Mol Des, 14(3):215–32, March 2000.
T. Madej, J. Gibrat, and S. Bryant. Threading a database of protein cores, 1995.
K. Mehlhorn. The LEDA Platform of Combinatorial and Geometric Computing. Cambridge University Press, 1999.
E.M. Mitchel, P.J. Artymiuk, D.W. Rice, and P. Willet. Use of Techniques Derived from Graph Theory to Compare Secondary Structure Motifs in Proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 212:151–166, 1989.
A.G. Murzin, S.E. Brenner, T. Hubbard, and C. Chothia. SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol., 247:536–540, 1995.
R. Nussinov and H.J. Wolfson. Efficient Detection of three-dimensional strcutral motifs in biological macromolecules by computer vision techniques. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 88:10495–10499, December 1991. Biophysics.
C.A. Orengo and W.R. Taylor. SSAP: Sequential Structure Alignment Program for Protein Structure Comparison. In R.F. Doolitle, editor, Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 266, pages 617–635. Academic Press, San Diego, 1996.
J.-R. Sack and J. Urrutia. Handbook of Computational Geometry (chapter: Discrete Geometric Shapes: Matching, Interpolation, and Approximation). Elsevier, 2000.
B. Sandak, R. Nussinov, and H.J. Wolfson. An Automated Robotics-Based Technique for Biomolecular Docking and Matching allowing Hinge-Bending Motion. Computer Applications in the Biosciences (CABIOS), 11:87–99, 1995.
M. Shatsky, Z.Y. Fligelman, R. Nussinov, and H.J Wolfson. Alignment of Flexible Protein Structures. In 8th International Conference on Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology, pages 329–343. The AAAI press, August 2000.
M. Shatsky, H.J Wolfson, and R. Nussinov. Flexible protein alignment and hinge detection. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics, 48:242–256, 2002.
I. Shindyalov and P. Bourne. Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (ce) of the optimal path. Protein Engineering, 11(9):739–747, 1998.
W. R. Taylor and C. A. Orengo. Protein structure alignment. J. Mol. Biol., 208:1–22, 1989.
G. Vriend and C. Sander. Detection of Common Three-Dimensional Substructures in Proteins. Proteins, 11:52–58, 1991.
T.D. Wu, S.C. Schmidler, and T. Hastie. Regression analysis of multiple protein structures. J Comput Biol, 5(3):585–595, 1998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Shatsky, M., Nussinov, R., Wolfson, H.J. (2002). MultiProt — A Multiple Protein Structural Alignment Algorithm. In: Guigó, R., Gusfield, D. (eds) Algorithms in Bioinformatics. WABI 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2452. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45784-4_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45784-4_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44211-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45784-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive