Skip to main content

Tuning Production Processes through a Case Based Reasoning Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Case-Based Reasoning (ECCBR 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2416))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper illustrates how the Case Based Reasoning (CBR) paradigm has been applied to the definition of the requirements and the specifications of a Knowledge Management technology supporting the handling of tuning and anomalies in production processes. In particular, the production of truck tyres will be illustrated as the application domain of the proposed approach. This domain is a paradigmatic example where the valorization of the experiential knowledge is a company requirement, so the representation of knowledge concerning production process issues is mandatory. It requires extending CBR techniques to an emerging area of application involving knowledge about the interplay of static objects (i.e. products) with dynamic objects (i.e. processes). The content of production cases, their organization into a Case Base and a first proposal for the Case Base retrieval of similar cases will be presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Prahalad, C.K., Hamel, G.: The core competence of the corporation. Strategic Learning in Knowledge Economy: Individual, Collective and Organizational Learning Process (2000) 3–22

    Google Scholar 

  2. Utterback, J.M.: Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (MA) (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bandini, S., Manzoni, S.: Product design as product revise. In Esposito, F., ed.: AI*IA 2001: Advances in Artificial Intelligence, 7th Congress of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence, Bari, Italy, September 25-28, 2001, Proceedings. Volume 2175 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science., Berlin, Springer (2001) 159–164

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kolodner, J.: Case-Based Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (CA) (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aha, D., Becerra-Fernandez, I., Maurer, F., Munoz-Avila, H., eds.: 1999 AAAI Workshop, Exploring Synergies of Knowledge Management and Case-Based Reasoning, Technical Report WS-99-19, Naval Research Lab, Navy Center for Applied Research in Artificial Intelligence (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Aha, D., Weber, R., eds.: 2000 AAAI Workshop, Intelligent Lessons Learned Systems, Technical Report AIC-00-005, Naval Research Lab, Navy Center for Applied Research in Artificial Intelligence (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Althoff, K.D., Birk, A., vonWangenheim, C.G., Tautz, C.: CBR for experimental software engineering. In Lenz, M., Bartsch-Spörl, B., Burkhard, H.D., Wess, S., eds.: Case-Based Reasoning Technology. Volume 1400 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science., Springer (1998) 235–254

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Bandini, S., Manzoni, S.: A support system based on CBR for the design of rubber compounds in motor racing. In Blanzieri, E., Portinale, L., eds.: Advances in Case-Based Reasoning, 5th European Workshop, EWCBR 2000, Trento, Italy, September 6-9, 2000, Proceedings. Volume 1898 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science., Berlin, Springer (2000) 348–357

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Bandini, S., Manzoni, S.: Modeling core knowledge and practices in a computational approach to innovation process. Model-Based Reasoning: Scientific Discovery, Technological Innovation, Values (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Proceedings of workshop on case-based reasoning approaches for process-oriented knowledge management, at 4th international conference on case-based reasoning, ICCBR 2001, vancouver (canada), july 30-august 2, 2001. online available at http://www.iccbr.org/iccbr01/workshops.html (2001)

  11. DeCindio, F., DeMichelis, G., Simone, C.: Giving back some freedom to system designers. System Research 2 (1985) 273–280

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wenger, E.: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge University Press, New York (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Simone, C., Sarini, M.: Adaptability of classification schemes: what does it mean? In: Proc.7th Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Copenhagen, September 2001, Kluwer Academic Press (2001) 19–38

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bandini, S., Manzoni, S., Simone, C. (2002). Tuning Production Processes through a Case Based Reasoning Approach. In: Craw, S., Preece, A. (eds) Advances in Case-Based Reasoning. ECCBR 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2416. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46119-1_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46119-1_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44109-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46119-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics