Skip to main content

A Coverage-Determination Mechanism for Checking Business Contracts against Organizational Policies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Technologies for E-Services (TES 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2444))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The EDEE system provides a framework through which businesses may store the data pertaining to business events, contracts and organizational policies, within a single repository using the unifying notion of an occurrence.A collection of stored queries (cf.SQL views) is maintained. Each query describes the occurrences promised and prohibited under the provisions of the contracts and policies of an organization. This paper proposes a mechanism for both the static and dynamic derivation of the overlaps between queries. We show, through worked examples, that by determining these covering relationships we can discover inconsistencies between business contracts and organizational policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. S. Abrahams and J. M. Bacon. The life and times of identified, situated, and conflicting norms. In Sixth International Workshop on Deontic Logic in Computer Science (DEON’02), Imperial College, London, UK, May 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. S. Abrahams and J. M. Bacon. A software implementation of Kimbrough’s disquotation theory for representing and enforcing electronic commerce contracts. Group Decision and Negotiations Journal, Forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Ayres and P. J. H. King. Querying graph databases using a functional language extended with second order facilities. In Advances in Databases, 14th British National Conference on Databases, BNCOD 14, Edinburgh, UK, July 3–5, 1996, Proceedings, pages 189–203.Springer, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. W. H. Bons, R. M. Lee, R.W. Wagenaar, and C. D. Wrigley. Modelling interorganizational trade procedures using documentary petri nets.In Proceedings of the Hawaii Internaional Conference on System Sciences, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. OASIS Provisioning Services Technical Committee. An introduction to the provisioningservices technical committee. http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/provision/Intro-102301.doc, 2001.

  6. A. Daskalopulu, T. Dimtrakos, and T. S. E. Maibaum. E-contract fulfillment and agents’ attitudes. In Proceedings ERCIM WG E-Commerce Workshop on the Role of Trust in E-Business, Zurich, October 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. OASIS ebXML Collaboration Protocol Profile and Agreement Technical Committee. Collab oration-protocol profile and agreement specification. http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ebxml-cppa/documents/ebcpp-2_0.pdf, 2002.

  8. C. Forgy. Rete: A fast algorithm for the many patterns/many objects match problem. Artificial Intelligence, 19(1):17–37, 1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Gupta and I. S. Mumick. Maintenance of materialized views: Problems, techniques, and applications. Data Engineering Bulletin, 18(2):3–18, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. O. Kimbrough. Reasoning about the objects of attitudes and operators: Towards a disquotation theory for the representation of propositional content. In Eight International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and the Law (ICAIL 2001), St Louis, Missouri, May 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Koetsier, P. Grefen, and J. Vonk. Cross-organisational workflow: Crossflow ESPRIT E/28635 contract model, deliverable D4b. Technical report, CrossFlow consortium, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Merz, E. GriFFel, T. Tu, S. Muller-Wilken, H. Weinreich, M. Boger, and W. Lamersdorf. Supporting electronic commerce transactions with contracting services. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 7(4):249–274, December 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. D. P. Miranker. TREAT: A better match algorithm for AI production system matching. In Proceedings of the 6th National Conference on ArtifIcial Intelligence, Seattle, WA, July 1987, pages 42–47.Morgan Kaufmann, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abrahams, A.S., Eyers, D.M., Bacon, J.M. (2002). A Coverage-Determination Mechanism for Checking Business Contracts against Organizational Policies. In: Buchmann, A., Fiege, L., Casati, F., Hsu, MC., Shan, MC. (eds) Technologies for E-Services. TES 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2444. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46121-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46121-3_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44110-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46121-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics