Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Using ECA Rules in Database Systems to Support Clinical Protocols

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2453))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1431 Accesses

Abstract

Computer-based support for clinical protocols or guidelines is currently a subject of a lot of interest within the Healthcare Informatics community. The Event-Condition-Action (ECA) rule paradigm, as supported in active databases and originating from production rules in expert systems, promises to be of great potential in supporting clinical protocols or guidelines. The problem being addressed in the authors’ work is that of managing complex information encountered in the management (i.e., the specification, execution and manipulation as well as querying) of clinical protocols whose specification and execution models are based on the ECA rule paradigm. This paper presents a generic framework and a mechanism for the management of ECA rule-based protocols using modern database technology.

A clinical guideline is “a set of schematic plans, at varying levels of detail, for the management of patients who have a particular clinical condition (e.g. insulin-dependent diabetes)” [1]. Clinical protocols are highly detailed clinical guidelines and are usually mandatory [2]. In this paper, the terms clinical guideline and clinical protocol refer to the same concept and are interchangeable.

An ECA rule monitors and reacts to a situation by performing a relevant action or task. Situation monitoring involves detecting an cyevent of interest and evaluating a condition associated with the event. The action is performed only if the condition holds [3].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shahar Y, (2001) Automated Support to Clinical Guidelines and Care Plans: the Intention-Oriented View, Ben Gurion University, Israel, http://www.openclinical.org/resources/reference/briefingpapers/shahar.pdf, 03/2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Miksch S (1999). Plan Management in the Medical Domain. AI Communications, 12(4), pp. 209–235.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dittrich KR, Gatziu S and Geppert A (1995). The Active Database Management System Manifesto: A Rulebase for ADBMS Features. In: Sellis T (ed): Proc 2nd Workshop on Rules in Database (RIDS), Athens, Greece, September 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Paton NW (1999). Active Rules in Database Systems. Springer, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Simon E and Kotz-Dittrich A (1995). Promises and realities of active database systems. In Proceedings 21st VLDB Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 642–653.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Appelrath H-J, Behrends H, Jasper H and Zukunft O (1995). Case studies on active database applications: Lessons learned. TR-AIS-9601, Tech. Report, University of Oldenburg, http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/appelrath95case.html, ResearchIndex, 03/2002.

  7. Widom J and Ceri S (1996). Active Database Systems: Triggers and Rules for Advanced Database Processing. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, California, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shortliffe, E. H., Scott, C. A., and Bischoff, M. B. (1981). ONCOCIN: An expert system for oncology protocol management. In Proc. Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 876–881.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Musen MA, Carlson RW, Fagan LM and Deresinski SC (1992). T-HELPER: Automated support for community-based clinical research. Proceedings of the 16th Annual Symposium on Computer Application in Medical Care, Washington, D.C., pp. 719–723.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shahar Y, Miksch S, and Johnson P (1998). The Asgaard Project: A Task-Specific Framework for the Application and Critiquing of Time-Oriented Clinical Guidelines. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 14:29–51, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fox J, Johns N and Rahmanzadeh A (1998). Disseminating medical knowledge: the PROforma Approach. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 14:pp. 157–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ohno-Machado L, Gennari JH, Murphy S, Jain NL, Tu SW, Oliver DE, et al. The GuideLine Interchange Format: A Model for Representing Guidelines. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 1998;5(4):357–372.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Peleg M, Boxwala AA, Omolala O, Zeng Q, Tu SW, Lucson R, Bernstam E, Ash N, Mork P, Ohno-Machado L, Shortliffe EH and Greenes RA (2000). GLIF3: The evolution of a guideline representation format. In Overhage MJ, ed, Proceedings 2000 AMIA Annual Symposium, LA, CA, Hanley and Belfus, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C Gordon and M Veloso (1996). The PRESTIGE Project: Implementing Guidelines in Healthcare MIE 96

    Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson D, Tu SW, Booth N, Sugden B and Purves IN (2000). Using scenarios in chronic disease management guidelines for primary care. In: Overhage MJ, ed, Proceedings of the of the 2000 AMIA Annual Symposium (LA, CA, USA), Hanley and Belfus, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tang TC and Young CY (2001). ActiveGuidelines: Integrating web-based guidelines with computerbased patient records. 2001 AMIA Annual Symposium, http://www.amia.org/pubs/symposia/D200173.PDF, 3/2002.

  17. Karras BT, Nath SD, and Shiffman RN 2000). A Preliminary Evaluation of Guideline Content Markup Using GEM-An XML Guideline Elements Model. In Overhage M.J.,, Ed., Proceedings of the 2000 AMIA Annual Symposium (Los Angeles, CA, 2000), 942, Hanley & Belfus, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shiffman RN, Karras BT, Agrawal A, Chen RC, Marenco L and Nath S (2000). GEM: A proposal for a more comprehensive guideline document model using XML. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 7:pp. 488–498.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tu SW and Musen MA (2001) Representation Formalisms and Computational Methods for Modeling Guideline-Based Patient Care, In: Heller B, Loffler M, Musen M and Stefanelli M (2001). Computer-Based Support for Clinical Guidelines and Protocols, Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Computer-based Support for Clinical Guidelines and Protocols, 2000, Leipzig, p. 115–132, IOS Press, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hripscak G, Luderman P, Pryor TA, Wigertz OB and Clayton PD (1994). Rationale for the Arden Syntax. Computers and Biomedical Research, 27:pp. 291–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Caironni PVC, Portoni L, Combi C, Pinciroli F and Ceri S (1997). HyperCare: a Prototype of an Active Database for Compliance with Essential Hypertension Therapy Guidelines. In: Proc 1997 AMIA Ann Fall Symposium, Philadelphia, PA, Hanley and Belfus, 1997:pp. 288–292

    Google Scholar 

  22. Clayton PD, Pryor TA, Wgertz OB and Hripcsak G (1989). Issues and Structures for Sharing Medical Knowledge Among Decision-making Systems: The 1989 Arden Homestead Retreat. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care, 1989:pp. 116–121.

    Google Scholar 

  23. ASTM (1992). E-1460: Standard Specification for Defining and Sharing Modular Health Knowledge Bases (Arden Syntax for Medical Logic Modules). In 1992 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 14.01, pp. 539–587. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  24. HL7 (1999). Arden Syntax for Medical Logic Modules. Standard of the Health Level 7, 1999, http://www.cpmc.columbia.edu/arden/arden-2.1-proposed-120300.doc, March 2002.

  25. Starren JB, Hripcsak G, Jordan D, Allen B, Weissman C and Clyaton PD (1994). Encoding a postoperatice coronary artery bypass surgery care plan in Edern Syntax. Comput Biol Med 1994 Sep; 24(5): pp. 411–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sherman EH, Hripcsak G, Starren J, Jenders RA and Clayton P (1995). Using intermediate states to improve the ability of the Arden Syntax to implement care plans and reuse knowledge. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1995: pp. 238–42

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sailors RM, Bradshaw RL and East TD (1998). Moving the Arden Syntax Outside of the (Alert) Box: A Paradigm for Supporting Multi-Step Clinical protocols. JAMIA, 5 (Symposium Supplement): pp. 1071.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jenders RA, Huang H, Hripcsak G and Clayton PD (1998). Evolution of a knowledge base for a clinical decision support system encoded in the Arden Syntax. In: Proc AMIA Symp, 1998:pp. 558–62

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jenders RA, Hripcsak G, Sideli RV, DuMouchel W, Zhang H, Cimino JJ, Johnson SB, Sherman EH and Clayton PD (1995). Medical decision support: experience with implementing the Arden Syntax at the Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center. In: Proc Annu Symb Comput Appl Med care, 1995:pp169–73

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wu B and Dube K (2001b) PLAN: a Framework and Specification Language with an Event-Condition-Action (ECA) Mechanism for Clinical Test Request Protocols. In Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-34): the Mini-Track in Information Technology in Healthcare, Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, California, p. 140.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Elmasri R and Navathe SB (2000). Fundamentals of Database Systems, 3rd Edition, Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts, Chap. 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  32. W Grimson, D Berry, J Grimson, G Stephens, E. Felton, P Given and R O’Moore. Federated healthcare record server-the Synapses paradigm. International Journal of Medical Informatics, Vol. 52, 1998, pp3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Science, School of Computing, Dublin Institute of Technology, Ireland

    Kudakwashe Dube & Bing Wu

  2. Computer Science, Trinity College Dublin, Ireland

    Jane B. Grimson

Authors
  1. Kudakwashe Dube
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bing Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jane B. Grimson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Université Paul Sabatier, IRIT, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062, Toulouse Cedex, France

    Abdelkader Hameurlain

  2. Département Informatique, Université Aix-Marseille II, IUT, 413 Avenue Gaston Berger, 13625, Aix-en-Provence Cedex 1, France

    Rosine Cicchetti

  3. Institute of Applied Computer Science, University of Linz, Altenbergerstr. 69, 4040, Linz, Austria

    Roland Traunmüller

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dube, K., Wu, B., Grimson, J.B. (2002). Using ECA Rules in Database Systems to Support Clinical Protocols. In: Hameurlain, A., Cicchetti, R., Traunmüller, R. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2453. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46146-9_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46146-9_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44126-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-46146-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation