Skip to main content

Robust Multi-scale Non-rigid Registration of 3D Ultrasound Images

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Scale-Space and Morphology in Computer Vision (Scale-Space 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2106 ((LNCS,volume 2106))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, we embed the minimization scheme of an automatic 3D non-rigid registration method in a multi-scale framework. The initial model formulation was expressed as a robust multiresolution and multigrid minimization scheme. At the finest level of the multiresolution pyramid, we introduce a focusing strategy from coarse-to-fine scales which leads to an improvement of the accuracy in the registration process. A focusing strategy has been tested for a linear and a non-linear scale-space. Results on 3D Ultrasound images are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. L. Alvarez, J. Weickert, and J. Sanchez. A scale-space approach to nonlocal optical flow calculations. In Scale-Space’ 99, pages 235–246, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Black and A. Rangarajan. On the unification of line processes, outlier rejection and robust statistics with applications in early vision. International Journal of Computer Vision, 19(1):57–91, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. F.L. Bookstein. Principal warps: Thin-plate slines and the decomposition of defomations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11(6):567–585, 1989.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. F. Catté, P.L. Lions, J.M. Morel, and T. Coll. Image selective smoothing and edge detection by nonlinear difusion. SIAM Journal on Numerical analysis, 29:182–193, 1992.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. P. Hellier, C. Barillot, E. Mémin, and P. Pérez. An energy-based framework for dense 3D registration of volumetric brain images. In IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), volume II, pages 270–275, Hilton Head Island, South Carolina, USA, June 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Horn and B. Schunck. Determining optical flow. Artificial Intelligence, 17:185–203, August 1981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Weber and J. Malik. Robust computation of optical flow in a multi-scale differential framework. International Journal of Computer Vision, 14:67–81, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. E. Mémin and P. Pérez. Dense estimation and object-based segmentation of the optical flow with robust techniques. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 7(5):703–719, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Morsy and O. VonRamm. 3D ultrasound tissue motion tracking using correlation search. Ultrasonic Imaging, 20:151–159, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. H.H. Nagel and W. Enkelmann. An investigation of smoothness constraints for the estimation of displacement vector fields from image sequences. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 8:565–593, 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. W.J. Niessen, J.S. Duncan, M. Nielsen, L.M.J. Florack, ter Haar Romeny B.M, and M.A. Viergever. A multiscale approach to image sequence analysis. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 65(2):259–268, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. X. Pennec, P. Cachier, and N. Ayache. Understanding the “demon’s algorithm”: 3D non-rigid registration by gradient descent. In MICCAI, pages 597–605, September 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Perona and J. Malik. Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 12(7):629–639, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Strintzis and I. Kokkinidis. Maximum likelihood motion estimation in ultrasound image sequences. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 4(6):156–157, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A.P. Witkin. Scale-space filtering. In International Joint Conference on Artificial intelligence, pages 1019–1023, Karlsruhe, W. Germany, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  16. F. Yeung, S. Levinson, D. Fu, and K. Parker. Feature-adaptive motion tracking of ultrasound image sequences using a deformable mesh. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 17(6):945–956, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pratikakis, I., Barillot, C., Hellier, P. (2001). Robust Multi-scale Non-rigid Registration of 3D Ultrasound Images. In: Kerckhove, M. (eds) Scale-Space and Morphology in Computer Vision. Scale-Space 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2106, vol 2106. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47778-0_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47778-0_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42317-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47778-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics