Skip to main content

LHS-Based Hybrid Microdata vs Rank Swapping and Microaggregation for Numeric Microdata Protection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Inference Control in Statistical Databases

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2316))

Abstract

In previous work by Domingo-Ferrer et al., rank swapping and multivariate microaggregation has been identified as well-performing masking methods for microdata protection. Recently, Dandekar et al. proposed using synthetic microdata, as an option, in place of original data by using Latin hypercube sampling (LHS) technique. The LHS method focuses on mimicking univariate as well as multivariate statistical characteristics of original data. The LHS-based synthetic data does not allow one to one comparison with original data. This prevents estimating the overall information loss by using current measures. In this paper we utilize unique features of LHS method to create hybrid data sets and evaluate their performance relative to rank swapping and multivariate microaggregation using generalized information loss and disclosure risk measures.

The second and third authors are partly supported by the European Commission under project IST-2000-25069 “CASC”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. R.A. Dandekar, “Performance improvement of restricted pairing algorithm for Latin hypercube sampling”, in ASA Summer Conference (unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  2. R.A. Dandekar, M. Cohen and N. Kirkendall, “Applicability of Latin hypercube sampling technique to create multivariate synthetic microdata”, in Proc. of ETKNTTS 2001. Luxembourg: Eurostat, pp. 839–847, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Defays and P. Nanopoulos, “Panels of enterprises and confidentiality: The small aggregates method”, in Proc. of 92 Symposium on Design and Analysis of Longitudinal Surveys. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, 195–204, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Domingo-Ferrer, J.M. Mateo-Sanz, and V. Torra, “Comparing SDC methods for microdata on the basis of information loss and disclosure risk”, Proc. of ETKNTTS 2001. Luxemburg: Eurostat, pp. 807–825, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Domingo-Ferrer and V. Torra, “A quantitative comparison of disclosure control methods for microdata”, in Confidentiality, Disclosure and Data Access, eds. P. Doyle, J. Lane, J. Theeuwes and L. Zayatz. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 111–133, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Domingo-Ferrer and J.M. Mateo-Sanz, “Practical data-oriented microaggregation for statistical disclosure control”, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 14, pp. 189–201, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R.L. Iman and W.J. Conover, “A distribution-free approach to inducing rank correlation among input variables”, Communications in Statistics, vol. B11, no. 3, pp. 311–334, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M.A. Jaro, “Advances in record-linkage methodology as applied to matching the 1985 Census of Tampa, Florida”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 84, pp. 414–420, 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A.B. Kennickell, “Multiple imputation and disclosure protection: the case of the 1995 survey of consumer finances”, in Statistical Data Protection. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, pp. 381–400, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M.D. McKay, W.J. Conover, and R.J. Beckman, “A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code”, Technometrics, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 239–245, 1979.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Moore, “Controlled data swapping techniques for masking public use microdata sets”, U. S. Bureau of the Census, 1996 (unpublished manuscript).

    Google Scholar 

  12. L. Willenborg and T. de Waal, Elements of Statistical Disclosure Control. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2001.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dandekar, R.A., Domingo-Ferrer, J., Sebé, F. (2002). LHS-Based Hybrid Microdata vs Rank Swapping and Microaggregation for Numeric Microdata Protection. In: Domingo-Ferrer, J. (eds) Inference Control in Statistical Databases. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2316. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47804-3_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47804-3_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43614-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47804-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics