Skip to main content

A Lexical Functional Mapping Algorithm

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Artificial Intelligence (Canadian AI 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2338))

Abstract

Semantic interpretation is the process of mapping a syntactic structure to a context-independent meaning representation. An algorithm is presented which maps the f-structure produced by a Lexical-Functional Grammar parser to thematic roles. The mapping algorithm integrates Lexical Mapping Theory, Grimshaw’s theory of prominence, and other semantic theories. The algorithm uses selectional restrictions from WordNet to enforce semantic compatibility among constituents.

This research was performed while the first author was at The University of Western Ontario and was funded by NSERC Research Grant 0036853.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Alsina. The Role of Argument Structure in Grammar: Evidence from Romance. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Bresnan and J. M. Kanerva. Locative inversion in chichewa: A case study of factorization in grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 20:1–50, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Bresnan and L. Moshi. Object asymmetries in comparative Bantu syntax. Linguistic Inquiry, 21:147–185, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Dowty. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Grimshaw. Argument Structure. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Kaplan and J. Bresnan. Lexical-Functional Grammar: A formal system for grammatical representation. In The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, pages 173–281. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. M. Kaplan and J. T. Maxwell. LFG Grammar-Writer’s Workbench. Technical Report, Xerox PARC, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. T. Mahdi. A Computational Approach to Lexical Functional Mapping. MSc Thesis, The University of Western Ontario, May 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  9. G. A. Miller, R. Beckwith, C. Fellbaum, D. Gross, and K. Miller. Introduction to wordnet: An on-line lexical database. International Journal of Lexicography, 3:235–244, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. K. P. Mohanan and T. Mohanan. Semantic representation in the architecture of LFG. Paper presented at the LFG Workshop, Grenoble, France, August 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Z. Vendler. Linguistics in philosophy. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mahdi, T.S., Mercer, R.E. (2002). A Lexical Functional Mapping Algorithm. In: Cohen, R., Spencer, B. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Canadian AI 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2338. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47922-8_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47922-8_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43724-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-47922-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics