Skip to main content

Automated Discovery of Decision Rule Chains Using Rough Sets and Medical Diagnostic Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Foundations of Intelligent Systems (ISMIS 2002)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 2366))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 652 Accesses

Abstract

One of the most important problems on rule induction methods is that they cannot extract rules, which plausibly represent experts’ decision processes. On one hand, rule induction methods induce probabilistic rules, the description length of which is too short, compared with the experts’ rules. On the other hand, construction of Bayesian networks generates too lengthy rules. In this paper, the characteristics of experts’ rules are closely examined and a new approach to extract plausible rules is introduced, which consists of the following three procedures. First, the characterization of decision attributes (given classes) is extracted from databases and the classes are classified into several groups with respect to the characterization. Then, two kinds of sub-rules, characterization rules for each group and discrimination rules for each class in the group are induced. Finally, those two parts are integrated into one rule for each decision attribute. The proposed method was evaluated on a medical database, the experimental results of which show that induced rules correctly represent experts’ decision processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agrawal, R., Imielinski, T., and Swami, A., Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases, in Proceedings of the 1993 International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD 93), pp. 207–216, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aha, D. W., Kibler, D., and Albert, M. K., Instance-based learning algorithm. Machine Learning, 6, 37–66, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Breiman, L., Freidman, J., Olshen, R., and Stone, C., Classification And Regression Trees, Wadsworth International Group, Belmont, 1984.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Buchnan, B. G. and Shortliffe, E. H., Rule-Based Expert Systems, Addison-Wesley, New York, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clark, P. and Niblett, T., The CN2 Induction Algorithm. Machine Learning, 3, 261–283, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Everitt, B. S., Cluster Analysis, 3rd Edition, John Wiley & Son, London, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Michalski, R. S., Mozetic, I., Hong, J., and Lavrac, N., The Multi-Purpose Incremental Learning System AQ15 and its Testing Application to Three Medical Domains, in Proceedings of the fifth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1041–1045, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pawlak, Z., Rough Sets. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1991.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Polkowski, L. and Skowron, A.: Rough mereology: a new paradigm for approximate reasoning. Intern. J. Approx. Reasoning 15, 333–365, 1996.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Quinlan, J.R., C4.5-Programs for Machine Learning, Morgan Kaufmann, Palo Alto, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Readings in Machine Learning, (Shavlik, J. W. and Dietterich, T.G., eds.) Morgan Kaufmann, Palo Alto, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Skowron, A. and Grzymala-Busse, J. From rough set theory to evidence theory. In: Yager, R., Fedrizzi, M. and Kacprzyk, J.(eds.) Advances in the Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence, pp. 193–236, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  13. SWI-Prolog Version 2.0.9 Manual, University of Amsterdam, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tsumoto, S. and Tanaka, H., PRIMEROSE: Probabilistic Rule Induction Method based on Rough Sets and Resampling Methods. Computational Intelligence, 11, 389–405, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tsumoto, S., Automated Induction of Medical Expert System Rules from Clinical Databases based on Rough Set Theory. Information Sciences 112, 67–84, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tsumoto, S. Extraction of Experts’ Decision Rules from Clinical Databases using Rough Set Model Intelligent Data Analysis, 2(3), 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zadeh, L.A., Toward a theory of fuzzy information granulation and its certainty in human reasoning and fuzzy logic. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 90, 111–127, 1997.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Ziarko, W., Variable Precision Rough Set Model. Journal of Computer and System Sciences. 46, 39–59, 1993.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tsumoto, S. (2002). Automated Discovery of Decision Rule Chains Using Rough Sets and Medical Diagnostic Model. In: Hacid, MS., Raś, Z.W., Zighed, D.A., Kodratoff, Y. (eds) Foundations of Intelligent Systems. ISMIS 2002. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2366. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48050-1_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48050-1_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-43785-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48050-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics