Skip to main content

Feature Subsets for Classifier Combination: An Enumerative Experiment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Multiple Classifier Systems (MCS 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2096))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A classifier team is used in preference to a single classifier in the expectation it will be more accurate. Here we study the potential for improvement in classifier teams designed by the feature subspace method: the set of features is partitioned and each subset is used by one classifier in the team. All partitions of a set of 10 features into 3 subsets containing (4, 4, 2) features and (4, 3, 3) features, are enumerated and nine combination schemes are applied on the three classifiers. We look at the distribution and the extremes of the improvement (or failure); the chances of the team outperforming the single best classifier if the feature space is partitioned at random; the relationship between the spread of the individual classifier accuracy and the team accuracy; and the combination schemes performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. K. Chen, L. Wang, and H. Chi. Methods of combining multiple classifiers with different features and their applications to text-independent speaker identification. International Journal on Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 11(3):417–445, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. T.G. Dietterich. Ensemble methods in machine learning. In J. Kittler and F. Roli, editors, Multiple Classifier Systems, volume 1857 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 1–15, Cagliari, Italy, 2000. Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. R.P.W. Duin and D.M.J. Tax. Experiments with classifier combination rules. In J. Kittler and F. Roli, editors, Multiple Classifier Systems, volume 1857 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 16–29, Cagliari, Italy, 2000. Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. T.K. Ho. The random space method for constructing decision forests. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20(8):832–844, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Y.S. Huang and C.Y. Suen. A method of combining multiple experts for the recognition of unconstrained handwritten numerals. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 17:90–93, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Kittler, M. Hatef, R.P.W. Duin, and J. Matas. On combining classifiers. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20(3):226–239, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Kittler, A. Hojjatoleslami, and T. Windeatt. Strategies for combining classifiers employing shared and distinct representations. Pattern Recognition Letters, 18:1373–1377, 1997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. L.I. Kuncheva. Genetic algorithm for feature selection for parallel classifiers. Information Processing Letters, 46:163–168, 1993.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. L.I. Kuncheva, J.C. Bezdek, and R.P.W. Duin. Decision templates for multiple classifier fusion: an experimental comparison. Pattern Recognition, 34(2):299–314, 2001.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. L.I Kuncheva and L.C. Jain. Designing classifier fusion systems by genetic algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 4(4):327–336, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. P. Latinne, O. Debeir, and C. Decaestecker. Different ways of weakening decision trees and their impact on classification accuracy of dt combination. In J. Kittler and F. Roli, editors, Multiple Classifier Systems, volume 1857 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 230–239, Cagliari, Italy, 2000. Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. H.-S. Park and S.-W. Lee. Off-line recognition of large-set handwritten characters with multiple hidden Markov models. Pattern Recognition, 29(2):231–244, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. van Breukelen, R.P.W Duin, D.M.J. Tax, and J.E. den Hartog. Combining classifiers for the recognition of handwritten digits. In I-st IAPR TC1 Workshop on Statistical Techniques in Pattern Recognition, pages 13–18, Prague, Czech Republic, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  14. K.-D. Wernecke. A coupling procedure for discrimination of mixed data. Biometrics, 48:497–506, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. L. Xu, A. Krzyzak, and C.Y. Suen. Methods of combining multiple classifiers and their application to handwriting recognition. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22:418–435, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kuncheva, L.I., Whitaker, C.J. (2001). Feature Subsets for Classifier Combination: An Enumerative Experiment. In: Kittler, J., Roli, F. (eds) Multiple Classifier Systems. MCS 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2096. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48219-9_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48219-9_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42284-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48219-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics