Skip to main content

Optimistic Asynchronous Multi-party Contract Signing with Reduced Number of Rounds

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP 2001)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 2076))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Optimistic asynchronous multi-party contract signing protocols have received attention in recent years as a compromise between efficient protocols and protocols avoiding a third party as a bottleneck of security. “Optimistic“ roughly means: in case all participants are honest and receive the messages from the other participants as expected, the third party is not involved at all. The best solutions known so far terminate within t + 2 rounds in the optimistic case, for any fixed set of n signatories and allowing up to t < n dishonest signatories. The protocols presented here achieve a major improvement compared to the state of the art: The number of rounds R is reduced from O(t) to O(1) for all n ≤ 2t + 1, and for n < 2t + 1, R grows remarkably slowly compared with numbers of rounds in \( o(t):If t \approx \frac{k} {{k + 1}}n then R \approx 2k \) .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. B. Baum-Waidner: Optimistic Asynchronous Multi-Party Contract Signing with Reduced Number of Rounds (long version including the detailed proofs); IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive 2001, May 2001, http://www.//eprint.iacr.org/

  2. N. Asokan, B. Baum-Waidner, M. Schunter, M. Waidner: Optimistic Synchronous Multi-Party Contract Signing; IBM Research Report RZ 3089 (#93135), Zürich, December 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. Asokan, M. Schunter, M. Waidner: Optimistic Protocols for Multi-Party Fair Exchange; IBM Research Report RZ 2892, Zürich, November 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. Asokan, M. Schunter, M. Waidner: Optimistic Protocols for Fair Exchange; 4th ACM Conf. on Computer and Communications Security, Zürich, April 1997, 6–17.

    Google Scholar 

  5. N. Asokan. V. Shoup, M. Waidner: Optimistic Fair Exchange of Digital Signatures; Eurocrypt’ 98, LNCS 1403, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1998, 591–606.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. B. Baum-Waidner, M. Waidner: Asynchronous Optimistic Multi-Party Contract Signing; IBM Research Report RZ3078 (#93124), Zürich, November 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Baum-Waidner, M. Waidner: Round-optimal and Abuse-free Optimistic Multi-Party Contract Signing; ICALP 2000, June 00, Geneve.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Ben-Or, O. Goldreich, S. Micali, R. L. Rivest: A Fair Protocol for Signing Contracts; IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 36/1 (1990) 40–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Blum: Three Applications of the Oblivious Transfer; Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California at Berkley, September 18, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Cramer, V. Shoup: A practical public key cryptosystem provably secure against adaptive chosen ciphertext attack; Crypto’ 98, LNCS 1462, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1998, 13–25.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Dolev, C. Dwork, M. Naor: Non-Malleable Cryptography; 23rd Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC) 1991, ACM, New York 1991, 542–552.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Even, Y. Yacobi: Relations Among Public Key Signature Systems; Technical Report Nr. 175, Computer Science Department, Technion, Haifa, Israel, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Garay, M. Jakobsson, P. MacKenzie: Abuse-free Optimistic Contract Signing; Crypto’ 99, LNCS 1666, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1999, 449–466.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Garay, P. MacKenzie: Abuse-free Multi-party Contract Signing; Intern. Symp. on Distr. Comput. (DISC’ 99), LNCS 1693, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1999, 151–165.

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. Goldwasser, S. Micali, R. Rivest: A Digital Signature Scheme Secure Against Adaptive Chosen-Message Attacks; SIAM J. Comput. 17/2 (1988) 281–308.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. A. Menezes, P. van Oorschot, S. Vanstone: Handbook of Applied Cryptography; CRC Press, Boca Raton 1997.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Micali: Certified E-Mail with Invisible Post Offices; 1997 RSA Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  18. B. Pfitzmann, M. Schunter, M. Waidner: Optimal Efficiency of Optimistic Contract Signing; ACM PODC’ 98, Puerto Vallarta 1998, 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Rabin: Transaction Protection by Beacons; Journal of Computer and System Sciences 27/ (1983) 256–267.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baum-Waidner, B. (2001). Optimistic Asynchronous Multi-party Contract Signing with Reduced Number of Rounds. In: Orejas, F., Spirakis, P.G., van Leeuwen, J. (eds) Automata, Languages and Programming. ICALP 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2076. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48224-5_73

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48224-5_73

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42287-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48224-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics