Skip to main content

Which Slightly Different View Is the Right One?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns (CAIP 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1689))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In the paper we consider a problem of the next view planning using stereo vision. Our objective is to resolve the ambiguities of occluded regions — parts of the scene which are acquired only in a one of the images of the two stereo views. We assume a general scene. The next view problem is first analyzed under the assumption that the next camera location can lie only in the particular epipolar plane, then we extend the analysis to a general set of possible camera locations. An important feature of the proposed approach is that it does not require 3-D reconstruction of the scene. Experimental results demonstrate the proposed solution.

This work was supported in part by the Austrian Science Foundation (FWF) under grant S7000.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. E. Chen and L. Williams. View Interpolation for Image Synthesis. Proc. SIG-GRAPH 93. In Computer Graphics 1993, pages 279–288.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Geiger, B. Ladendorf, and A. Yuille. Occlusions and Binocular Stereo. International Journal of Computer Vision, 14:211–226,1995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. J. J. Little and W. E. Gillett. Direct Evidence for Occlusion in Stereo and Motion. In Proceedings of First European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 336–340, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. N. Kutulakos and C. R. Dyer Global Surface reconstruction by Purposive Control of Observer Motion. Tech. Rep. 1141 Computer Sciences Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, April 1993. Available via ftp from ftp.cs.wisc.edu.

  5. S. M. Seitz and C. R. Dyer. Photorealistic Scene Reconstruction by Voxel Coloring. In Proceedings on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1067–1073, June 1997, Puerto Rico.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. M. Seitz and C. R. Dyer. View Morphing. In Proceedings of Computer Graphics, pages 21–30, Annual Conference series, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. Werner, R.D. Hersch, and V. Hlaváĉ. Rendering Real-World Object Without 3-D Model In Proceedings of 6th International Conference, CAIP'95, pages 146–153, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Maver, J. (1999). Which Slightly Different View Is the Right One?. In: Solina, F., Leonardis, A. (eds) Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns. CAIP 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1689. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48375-6_54

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48375-6_54

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66366-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48375-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics