Skip to main content

Strategies for Filtering E-mail Messages Combining Content-Based and Sociological Filtering with User-Stereotypes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Next Generation Information Technologies and Systems (NGITS 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1649))

  • 234 Accesses

Abstract

A prototype system was developed to test the applicability of a dualmethod information-filtering model for filtering e-mail messages: content-based filtering and sociological filtering implemented with user stereotypes. This paper reports the main results of experiments that were run to determine the effects of combining the two methods in various ways. A major outcome of the experiments is that the combination of both methods yields better results than using each method individually. The optimal combination of the two filtering methods is stereotype dependent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balabanovic M. and Shoham Y. (1997), ‘Fab: Content-Based Collaborative Recommendation System’. Comm. of the ACM, Vol. 40(3), pp. 66–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jain A.K., Dubes R.C. (1988),Algorithms for Clustering Data. Prentice Hall Advanced Reference Series.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Malone T., Grant K., Turbak F., Brobst S. and Cohen M.: 1987, ‘Intelligent Information Sharing Systems’. Comm. of the ACM, Vol. 30(5), pp. 390–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McLeary H. (1994), ‘Filtered Information Services-A Revolutionary New Product or a New Marketing Strategy?’ Online, Vol. 4(18), pp. 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Morita M. and Shinoda Y. (1994), ‘Information Filtering Based on User Behavior Analysis and Best Match Retrieval’. In: Proceedings of the 17th Annual Intl. ACM SIGIR Conference for Research and Development, pp. 272–281.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shapira B., Hanani U., Raveh A. and Shoval P. (1997), ‘Information Filtering: A New Two-Phase Model Using Stereotypic Profiling’. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, Vol.8, pp. 155–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shapira B., Shoval P.and Hanani U. (1997). ‘Stereotypes in Information Filtering Systems’. Information Processing & Management, Vol. 33(3), pp. 273–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shardanand U. and Maes P. (1995), ‘Social Information Filtering Algorithm for Automating “Word of Mouth”’. Proceedings of the 1995 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 210–217.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Shoval, P., Shapira, B., Hanani, U. (1999). Strategies for Filtering E-mail Messages Combining Content-Based and Sociological Filtering with User-Stereotypes. In: Pinter, R.Y., Tsur, S. (eds) Next Generation Information Technologies and Systems. NGITS 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1649. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48521-X_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48521-X_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66225-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48521-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics