Skip to main content

Enhancing Clinical Practice Guideline Compliance by Involving Physicians in the Decision Process

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIMDM 1999)

Abstract

Despite the proliferation of implemented clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) as decision support systems, there is still little evidence of changes in physicians behavior. The reasons usually evoked to explain the low physicians compliance consider the incompleteness of guidelines knowledge, the impreciseness of the terms used and the physicians psychological reluctance. Another reason comes from the original verbal design of CPGs as well as the impossibility to enumerate all the contexts in which a guideline applies, which avoid the automatised control of all CPGs interpretations and therefore the design of robust formal models. The OONCODOC approach proposes a decision support framework for implementing guidelines where the context-based interpretation is controlled by clinicians. The first application deals with breast cancer therapy. Experimented in real size at the point of care, the system demonstrated significantly high scores of theoretical agreement with CPGs recommendations and compliance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tierney, W. M., Overhage, J. M., Takesue, B. Y., Harris, L. E., Murray, M. D., Vargo, D. L., McDonald, C. J. Computerizing guidelines to improve care and patient outcomes: The example of heart failure. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1995; 2(5): 316–22.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aliferis, C. F., Miller, R. A. On the heuristic nature of medical decision-support systems. Methods Inf Med 1995; 34(1/2): 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bouaud, J., Séroussi, B., Antoine, E.-C., Gozy, M., Khayat, D., Boisvieux, J.-F. Hypertextual navigation operationalizing generic clinical practice guidelines for patient-specific therapeutic decisions. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998; 5(suppl): 488–92.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ohno-Machado, L., Gennari, J. H., Murphy, S. H., Jain, N. L., Tu, S. W., Oliver, D. E., Pattison-Gordon, E., Greenes, R. A., Shortlié, E. H., Barnett, G. O. The Guideline Interchange Format: A model for representing guidelines. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998; 5(4): 357–72.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fox, J., Johns, N., Rahmanzadeh, A. Disseminating medical knowledge: the PRO-forma approach. Artif Intell Med 1998; 14(1,2): 157–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zielstorff, R. D., Teich, J. M., Paterno, M. D., Segal, M., Kuperman, G. J., Hiltz, F. L., Fox, R. L. P-cape: A high-level tool for entering and processing clinical practice guidelines. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998; 5(suppl): 478–82.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Shiffman, R. N., Greenes, R. A. Improving clinical guidelines with logic and decision-table techniques: Application to hepatitis imminization recommendations. Med Decis Making 1994; 14: 245–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Shahar, Y., Miksch, S., Johnson, P. The Asgaard project: a task-specific framework for the application and critiquing of time-oriented guidelines. Artif Intell Med 1998; 14(1,2): 29–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Quaglini, S., Dazzi, L., Gatti, L., Stefanelli, M., Fassino, C., Tondini, C. Supporting tools for guideline development and dissemination. Artif Intell Med 1998; 14(1,2): 119–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lobach, D. F. Electronically distributed, computer-generated, individualized feedback enhances the use of a computerized practice guideline. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1996; 3(suppl): 493–7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zielstorff, R. D. Online practice guidelines: Issues, obstacles, and future prospects. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998; 5(3): 227–36.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Patel, V. L., Allen, V. G., Arocha, J. F., Shortliffe, E. H. Representing clinical guidelines in GLIF: individual and collaborative expertise. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998; 5(5): 467–83.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Degoulet, P., Fieschi, M., Chatellier, G. Decision support systems from the standpoint of knowledge representation. Methods Inf Med 1995; 34(1/2): 202–8.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, J. C. S., Shiffman, R. N. Operationalization of clinical practice guidelines using fuzzy logic. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997; 4(suppl): 283–7.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tierney, W. M., Overhage, J. M., McDonald, C. J. Computerizing guidelines: Factors for success. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1996; 3(suppl): 562–6.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Berger, J. T., Rosner, F. The ethics of practice guidelines. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 2051–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Advani, A., Lo, K., Shahar, Y. Intention-based critiquing of guideline-oriented medical care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1998; 5(suppl): 483–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Séroussi, B., Bouaud, J., Antoine, ÉC. (1999). Enhancing Clinical Practice Guideline Compliance by Involving Physicians in the Decision Process. In: Horn, W., Shahar, Y., Lindberg, G., Andreassen, S., Wyatt, J. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. AIMDM 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1620. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48720-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48720-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-66162-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48720-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics