Skip to main content

Intention Reconsideration Reconsidered

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Agents V: Agents Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL 1998)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1555))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the issue of designing agents that successfully balance the amount of time spent in reconsidering their intentions against the amount of time spent acting to achieve them. Following a brief review of the various ways in which this problem has previously been analysed, we motivate and introduce a simple formal model of agents, which is closely related to the well-known belief-desire-intention model. In this model, an agent is explicitly equipped with mechanisms for deliberation and action selection, as well as a meta-level control function, which allows the agent to choose between deliberation and action. Using the formal model, we define what it means for an agent to be optimal with respect to a task environment, and explore how various properties of an agent’s task environment can impose certain requirements on its deliberation and meta-level control components. We then show how the model can capture a number of interesting practical reasoning scenarios, and illustrate how our notion of meta-level control can easily be extended to encompass higherorder meta-level reasoning. We conclude with a discussion and pointers to future work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. E. Bratman. Intentions, Plans, and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. E. Bratman, D. J. Israel, and M. E. Pollack. Plans and resource-bounded practical reasoning. Computational Intelligence, 4:349–355, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. P. R. Cohen and H. J. Levesque. Intention is choice with commitment. Artificial Intelligence, 42:213–261, 1990.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. R. Fagin, J. Y. Halpern, Y. Moses, and M. Y. Vardi. Reasoning About Knowledge. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1995.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. M. P. Georgeff and A. L. Lansky. Reactive reasoning and planning. In Proceedings of the Sixth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-87), pages 677–682, Seattle, WA, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Kinny and M. Georgeff. Commitment and effectiveness of situated agents. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-91), pages 82–88, Sydney, Australia, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. P. Müller. The right agent (architecture) to do the right thing. In J. P. Müller, M. P. Singh, and A. S. Rao, editors, Intelligent Agents V—Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL-98), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1999. In this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Perlis. Meta in logic. In P. Maes and D. Nardi, editors, Meta-Level Architectures and Reflection, pages 37–49. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. E. Pollack and M. Ringuette. Introducing the Tileworld: Experimentally evaluating agent architectures. In Proceedings of the Eighth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-90), pages 183–189, Boston, MA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. S. Rao and M. Georgeff. Decision procedures of BDI logics. Journal of Logic and Computation, 8(3):293–344, 1998.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Russell and P. Norvig. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice-Hall, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Russell and D. Subramanian. Provably bounded-optimal agents. Journal of AI Research, 2:575–609, 1995.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. K. Schild. On the relationship between BDI logics and standard logics of concurrency. In J. P. Müller, M. P. Singh, and A. S. Rao, editors, Intelligent Agents V—Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL-98), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1999. In this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Turner. Truth and Modality for Knowledge Representation. Pitman Publishing: London, 1990.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. M. Wooldridge and N. R. Jennings. Intelligent agents: Theory and practice. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 10(2):115–152, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wooldridge, M., Parsons, S. (1999). Intention Reconsideration Reconsidered. In: Müller, J.P., Rao, A.S., Singh, M.P. (eds) Intelligent Agents V: Agents Theories, Architectures, and Languages. ATAL 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1555. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49057-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49057-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65713-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49057-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics