Skip to main content

On Teaching and Learning Intersection-Closed Concept Classes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Learning Theory (EuroCOLT 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1572))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We consider the self-directed learning model [7] which is a variant of Littlestone’s mistake-bound model [9,10]. We will refute the conjecture of [8,2] that for intersection-closed concept classes, the self-directed learning complexity is related to the VC-dimension. We show that, even under the assumption of intersection-closedness, both parameters are completely incomparable.

We furthermore investigate the structure of intersection-closed concept classes which are difficult to learn in the self-directed learning model. We show that such classes must contain maximum classes.

We consider the teacher-directed learning model [5] in the worst, best and average case performance. While the teaching complexity in the worst case is incomparable to the VC-dimension, large concept classes (e.g. balls) are bounded by VC-dimension with respect to the average case. We show that the teaching complexity in the best case is bounded by the self-directed learning complexity. It is also bounded by the VCdimension, if the concept class is intersection-closed. This does not hold for arbitrary concept classes. We find examples which substantiate this gap.

The author likes to thank Hans Ulrich Simon, Norbert Klasner, Michael Schmitt, Andreas Birkendorf and unidentified referees for helpful hints and discussions. The author gratefully acknowledges the support of the German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development (grant I-403-001.06/95).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. S. Ben-David and N. Eiron. Self-directed learning and its relation to the vc dimension and to teacher-directed learning. to appear, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Ben-David, N. Eiron, and E. Kushilevitz. On self-directed learning. Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory, 8:136–143, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. S. Floyd. On space-bounded learning and the vapnik-chervonenkis dimension. PhD thesis, International Computer Science Institute Technicak Report TR-89061, Berkeley, California, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Floyd and M. Warmuth. Sample compression, learnability, and the vapnikchervonenkis dimension. Machine Learning, 21:269–304, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S.A. Goldman and M.J. Kearns. On the complexity of teaching. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 50:20–31, 1995.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. S.A. Goldman and D.H. Mathias. Teaching a smarter learner. Journal of Com-puter and System Sciences, 52(20):255–267, 1996.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. S.A. Goldman, R. L. Rivest, and R.E. Schapire. Learning binary relations and total orders. SIAM Journal of Computation, 22(5):1006–1034, 1993.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. S.A. Goldman and R.H. Sloan. The power of self-directed learning. Machine Learning, 14:271–294, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. Littlestone. Learning with irrelevant attributes abound: A new linear-threshold algorithm. Machine Learning, 2:285–318, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. Littlestone. Mistake bound and logarithmic linear-threshold learning algorithms. PhD Thesis, U.C. Santa Cruz, March 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B.K. Natarajan. Probabaly approximate learning of sets and functions. SIAM Journal of Computing, 20(2):328–351, 1991.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. R.L. Rivest and Y.L. Yin. Being taught can be faster than asking questions. Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Conference on Computational Learning Theory, 8:144–151, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. Sauer. On the density of families of sets. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, 13:145–147, 1972.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kuhlmann, C. (1999). On Teaching and Learning Intersection-Closed Concept Classes. In: Fischer, P., Simon, H.U. (eds) Computational Learning Theory. EuroCOLT 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 1572. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49097-3_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49097-3_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65701-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49097-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics