Skip to main content

Balanced Randomized Tree Splitting with Applications to Evolutionary Tree Constructions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
STACS 99 (STACS 1999)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 1563))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We present a new technique called balanced randomized tree splitting. It is useful in constructing unknown trees recursively. By applying it we obtain two new results on efficient construction of evolutionary trees: a new upper time-bound on the problem of constructing an evolutionary tree from experiments, and a relatively fast approximation algorithm for the maximum agreement subtree problem for binary trees for which the maximum number of leaves in an optimal solution is large. We also present new lower bounds for the problem of constructing an evolutionary tree from experiments and for the problem of constructing a tree from an ultrametric distance matrix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. C. Culbertson and P. Rudnicki. A fast algorithm for constructing trees from distance matrices. Information Processing Letters, 30(4):215–220, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Farach, S. Kannan, and T. J. Warnow. A robust model for finding optimal evolutionary trees. Algorithmica, 13(1/2):155–179, 1995.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Farach, T. M. Przytycka, and M. Thorup. Computing the agreement of trees with bounded degrees. In P. Spirakis, editor, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 979: Proceedings of the Third Annual European Symposium on Algorithms, pages 381–393. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Farach and M. Thorup. Fast comparison of evolutionary trees (extended abstract). In Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 481–488, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. R. Finden and A. D. Gordon. Obtaining common pruned trees. Journal of Classification, 2:255–276, 1985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. L. Gasieniec, J. Jansson, A. Lingas, and A. Östlin. On the complexity of computing evolutionary trees. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1276: Proceedings of the 3rd Annual International Computing and Combinatorics Conference, pages 134–145, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. R. Henzinger, V. King, and T. J. Warnow. Constructing a tree from homeomorphic subtrees, with applications to computational biology. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pages 333–340, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. K. Kannan, E. L. Lawler, and T. J. Warnow. Determining the evolutionary tree using experiments. Journal of Algorithms, 21:26–50, 1996.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Y. Kao. Tree contractions and evolutionary trees. SIAM Journal on Computing, 1998. To appear.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Y. Kao, T. W. Lam, T. M. Przytycka, W. K. Sung, and H. F. Ting. General techniques for comparing unrooted evolutionary trees. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 54–65, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Keselman and A. Amir. Maximum agreement subtree in a set of evolutionary trees-metrics and efficient algorithms. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual IEEE Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science, pages 758–769, 1994. To appear in SIAM Journal on Computing.

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. Phillips and T. J. Warnow. The asymmetric median tree-a new model for building consensus trees. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching, pages 234–252, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Steel and T. J. Warnow. Kaikoura tree theorems: Computing the maximum agreement subtree. Information Processing Letters, 48:77–82, 1993.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1999 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kao, MY., Lingas, A., Östlin, A. (1999). Balanced Randomized Tree Splitting with Applications to Evolutionary Tree Constructions. In: Meinel, C., Tison, S. (eds) STACS 99. STACS 1999. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1563. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49116-3_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49116-3_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-65691-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-49116-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics