Skip to main content

The LEX-project — Concepts and results

  • Semantics And Discourse Analysts
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Natural Language at the Computer (IBM 1988)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 320))

Included in the following conference series:

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

6 References

  • Alschwee, B., A. Blaser, Hein and Hubert Lehmann, W. Schönfeld (1985): “Ein juristisches Expertensystem mit natürlichsprachlichem Dialog — Ein Projektbericht”, W. Bauer, B. Radig (eds.): Wissensbasierte Systeme: Procedings Systems 85. (Informatik Fachberichte 112). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alschwee, B., S. Grundmann (1986): “System design for a computer-aided juridical expert system”, A. A. Martino, F. S. Natali (eds.): Automated analysis of legal texts, logic, informatics, law. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 567–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alschwee, B. (1986): “Analyse natürlicher Sprache in einem juristischen Expertensystem”, U. Erdmann, H. Fiedler, F. Haft, R. Traunmüller (eds.): Computergestützte juristische Expertensysteme. (Neue Methoden im Recht 1), Tübingen: Attempto. 87–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asher, N., H. Wada (1987): “A Computational Account of Syntactic, Semantic, and Discourse Principles for Anaphora Resolution”, (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäuerle, R. (1987): “Ereignisse und Repräsentationen”, (manuscript), U. Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, B., Lehmann, Hubert, Zoeppritz, M. (1986): “A word database for natural language processing”, Proceedings 11th International Conference on Computational Linguistics COLING86 August 25th to 29th, 1986, Bonn, Fedral Republic of Germany. 435–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolinger, D. (1979): “Pronouns in Discourse”, in: T. Givon (ed.): Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 12: Discourse and Syntax, Academic Press, New York, 289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H. and C. R. Marshall (1981): “Definite Reference and Mutual Knowledge”, in: B. L. Webber, A. K. Joshi, and I. A. Sag (eds.): Elements of Discourse Understanding, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, B. J. (1977): “The Representation and Use of Focus in Dialogue Understanding”, Technical Note 151, SRI International, Menlo Park, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, B. J., C. L. Sidner (1986): “Attention, Intention, and the Structure of Discourse”, Computational Linguistics, 12 nr. 3, 175–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundmann, S. (1985): “Pluralité des domaines juridiques — multiplicité dans les methodes d'enseignement par ordinateur” paper submitted to Conference of the Council of Europe on "Law and Computers", October 9–11, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundmann, S. (1986a): “Juristische Expertensysteme — Brücke von (Rechts)informatik zur Rechtstheorie”. U. Erdmann, H. Fiedler, F. Haft, R. Traunmüller (eds.): Computergestützte juristische Expertensysteme. (Neue Methoden im Recht 1), Tübingen: Attempto. 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundmann, S. (1986b): “Vorüberlegungen zur Ausarbeitung eines computergestützten juristischen Expertensystems”, Datenverarbeitung im Recht (DVR), 175–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundmann, S. (1986c): “Computergestützte juristische Lernsysteme in deutschsprachigen Ländern”, Juristische Schulung (JUS), 580–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundmann, S., Schönfeld, W. (1986): “Ein juristisches Expertensystem”, State of the Art 1, 46–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guenthner, F., Hubert Lehmann (1983): “Rules for pronominalization”, First Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Pisa. Proceedings of the Conference, Stanford: ACL. 144–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guenthner, F., Hubert Lehmann (1984): “Automatic Construction of Discourse Representation Structures”, Proceedings 10th International Conference on Computational Linguistics COLING84, Stanford, July 2–6, 1984, Morristown: Association for Computational Linguistics, 398–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guenthner, F., Hubert Lehmann, W. Schönfeld (1986): “A theory for the representation of knowledge”, IBM Journal of Research and Development 30, nr. 1, 39–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haft, F., R. P. Jones, T. Wetter (1987): “A natural language based legal expert system project for consultation and tutoring — the LEX project”, 1st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Boston, Mass, May 1987, to appear in the proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajicová, E. (1983): “Topic and Focus”, Theoretical Linguistics 10, 268–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarke, M., J. Krause, Y. Vassiliou (1986): “Studies in the evaluation of a domain-independent natural language query system”, L. Bolc, M. Jarke (eds.): Cooperative Interfaces to Information Systems, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Tokyo: Springer. 101–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R.P., van Wyk, J. (1986): “Computers in legal education”, Yearbook of Law Computers and Technology, Vol. 3, Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H. (1981a): “A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation”, in: J. A. G. Groendijk, T. M. V. Janssen, und M. B. J. Stokhof (eds.), Formal methods in the Study of Language, MC TRACT 135, Amsterdam, p. 277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H. (1981b): “Evénements, représentations discursives et référence temporelle”, Langages 64, pp.39–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, H., C. Rohrer (1983): “Tense in Texts” in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, A. v. Stechow (eds.): Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, de Gruyter, Berlin, p.250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogon, R., D. Lattermann, Hubert Lehmann, N. Ott, M. Zoeppritz (1976): “The User Specialty Languages System”, E. J. Neuhold (ed.): Proceedings of the 6th Annual Meeting of the Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI) Berlin, Springer, 221–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, H.-P. (1987): “Diskursrepäsentationstheorie und Deduktion”, Linguistische Berichte 110, 247–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, J. (1980): “Natural language access to information systems: An evaluation study of its acceptance by endusers”, Information Systems 5, 297–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, J. (1982): Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion in natürlicher Sprache, Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasnik, H. (1976): “Remarks on Coreference”, Linguistic Analysis, vol. 2, nr. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hehmann, Hein (1986): “Das juristische Konsultationssystem LEX aus software-technischer Sicht”, U. Erdmann, H. Fiedler, F. Haft, R. Traunmüller (eds.): Computergestützte juristische Expertensysteme. (Neue Methoden im Recht 1), Tübingen: Attempto. 49–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, Hubert (1978): “Interpretation of natural language in an information system”, IBM Journal of research and development 22, 560–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, Hubert (1985): “Ein juristisches Expertensystem auf der Grundlage von Linguistik und Logik”, B. Endres-Niggemeyer, J. Krause (eds.): Sprachverarbeitung in Information und Dokumentation: Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Linguistische Datenverarbeitung (GLDV) in Kooperation mit der Fachgruppe 3 ‘Natürlichsprachliche Systeme’ im FA 1.2 der Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI). Hannover, 5.–7. März 1985 Proceedings. (Informatik-Fachberichte 114), Berlin, Heidelberg, New York Toronto: Springer, 92–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, Hubert (1986a): “Formale Repräsentation juristischen Wissens”, U. Erdmann, H. Fiedler, F. Haft, R. Traunmüller (eds.): Computergestützte juristische Expertensysteme. (Neue Methoden im Recht 1), Tübingen: Attempto. 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, Hubert (1986b): “Ein juristisches Expertensystem auf der Grundlage von Linguistik und Logik”, C. Hackl, O. Herzog (eds.): Proceedings des Symposiums über Verarbeitung natürlicher Sprache und Expertensysteme, Bad Neuenahr, in print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, Hubert (1987): “Realisierung der natürlichsprachlichen Komponente eines Expertensystems”, W. Wilss, K.-D. Schmitz (eds.): Maschinelle Übersetzung — Methoden und Werkzeuge. Akten des 3. Internationalen Kolloquiums des Sonderforschungsbereichs 100 “Elektronische Sprachforschung”, Saarbrücken, 1.–3. September 1986, Niemeyer, Tübingen, 49–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, Hubert, N. Ott, M. Zoeppritz (1978) “User experiments with natural language for data base access” Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Bergen 14th to 18th August 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, Hubert, N. Ott, M. Zoeppritz (1985): “A multilingual interface to databases”, IEEE Database Engineering Bulletin, 8.3, September 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, Hubert, M. Zoeppritz (1986): “Formale Behandlung des Begriffs ‘Pflicht'”, G. Hommel and S. Schindler (eds.): GI Jahrestagung 6.–10. Oktober 1986, Berlin, Springer. II:39272-405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. (1986): “Mentale Modelle, Diskursrepräsentationstheorie und Raum”, FNS-Script 86-2, U. Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. (1987a): “Partikelverben und Bewegung”, (manuscript), U. Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. (1987b): “Bewegung und Kohärenz”, (manuscript), U. Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, N., Horländer, K. (1985): “Removing redundant join operations in queries involving views”, Information Systems 10, nr. 3, 279–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, N., M. Zoeppritz (1979): “USL — An experimental information system based on natural language”, L. Bolc (ed.): Natural language based computer systems. Natural communication with computers, vol. 2, München, Wien: Carl Hanser-Verlag, London, Melbourne: Macmillan, 256–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, B. H. (1984): “Nominal and Temporal Anaphora”, Linguistics and Philosophy 7, 243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, T. (1979): “Syntactic Domains for Semantic Rules”, in F. Guenthner and S. J. Schmidt (eds.): Formal Semantics and Pragmatics for Natural Languages, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhart, T. (1983): “Coreference and Bound Anaphora: A Restatement of the Anaphora Questions”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 6, 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyle, U. (1987): “Zeit und Aspekt bei der Verarbeitung natürlicher Sprachen”, LILOG-Report 9, IBM, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sag, I. A., J. Hankamer (1984): “Toward a Theory of Anaphoric Processing”, Linguistics and Philosophy 7, 325–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönfeld, W. (1985): “Prolog extensions based on tableau calculus”, Aravind Joshi (ed.): Proceedings International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 18–23 August, 1985, Los Angeles, California, 730–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidner, C. L. (1981): “Focusing for Interpretation of Pronouns”, AJCL, 7 nr. 4, 217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vassiliou, Y., M. Jarke, E. A. Stohr, J. A. Turner, N. H. White (1983): “Natural language for data base queries: A laboratory study”, MIS Quarterly 7 nr. 4, 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetter, T. (1986): “Expert systems and expert judgement”, NATO ASI Porto, August 1986, to appear in the proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, S. (1986): “Der Fokusbegriff und seine Verwendung in der Anaphoratheorie”, FNS Script-86-3, U. Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, R. (1984): Halbautomatische Erweiterung eines bestehenden Thesaurus, Diploma thesis. Heidelberg University and Fachhochschule Heilbronn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoeppritz, M. (1976): “On the ordering of nominal elements in sentences”, G. Nickel (ed.): Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Applied Linguistics, 1975, Stuttgart. HochschulVerlag. 1:139–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoeppritz, M. (1981): “The meaning of OF and HAVE in the USL System”, American Journal of Computational Linguistics, 7, 109–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoeppritz, M. (1983): “Human factors of a ‘natural language’ enduser system”, A. Blaser, M. Zoeppritz (eds.): Enduser systems and their human factors, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 150, Heidelberg: Springer, 62–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoeppritz, M. (1984): Syntax for German in the User Specialty Languages System. Sprache und Information Band 9, Tübingen: Niemeyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoeppritz, M. (1985): “Ein Sprachmodell für die Softwareergonomie”, B. Endres-Niggemeyer, J. Krause (eds.): Sprachverarbeitung in Information und Dokumentation: Jahrestagung der Gesellschaft für Linguistische Datenverarbeitung (GLDV) in Kooperation mit der Fachgruppe 3 ‘Natürlichsprachliche Systeme’ im FA 1.2 der Gesellschaft für Informatik (GI). Hannover, 5.–7. März 1985 Proceedings. (Informatik-Fachberichte 114), Berlin, Heidelberg, New York Toronto: Springer 1985: 67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoeppritz, M. (1986a): “Investigating human factors in natural language data base query”, J. L. Mey (ed.): Language and discourse: Test and protest, A Festschrift for Petr Sgall. (Linguistic and Literary Studies in Eastern Europe 19). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. 585–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zoeppritz, M. (1986b): “A Framework for Investigating Language-Mediated Interaction with Machines”, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 25, 295–315.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Albrecht Blaser

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lehmann, H. (1988). The LEX-project — Concepts and results. In: Blaser, A. (eds) Natural Language at the Computer. IBM 1988. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 320. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-50011-1_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-50011-1_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-50011-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-45885-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics