Abstract
We introduce generalized multi-prover interactive proof systems and the associated polynomial time complexity classes IP(m, r, 1/h), which depend on the number m of provers, number r of rounds and the value 1/h by which the error is bounded away from one half. In this denotation the class IP(m, r) of languages accepted by ordinary IP-systems with m provers and r rounds appears as IP(m, r, 1/6), whereas we define IP'(m, r) to be the union of all IP(m, r, 1/h) with an arbitrary polynomial h. We prove several simulation theorems that enable us to prove most of the known relations between different IP-classes and a collapse of the IP' hierarchy to essentially only four classes, namely
Finally we show how to reduce the space needed by an interactive proof system introducing one additional prover.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
L. Babai. Trading group theory for randomness. 17th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), 421–429, 1985.
L. Babai. E-mail and the unexpected power of interaction. 5th Structure in Complexity Theory (IEEE), 30–44, 1990.
L. Babai, L. Fortnow, C. Lund. Non-deterministic exponential time has two-prover interactive protocols. University of Chicago Technical Report 90-03, 1990.
M. Ben-Or, S. Goldwasser, J. Kilian, A. Wigderson. Multi-prover interactive proofs: How to remove the intractability assumptions. 20th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), 113–131, 1988.
R. Boppana, J. Håstad, S. Zachos. Does co-NP have short interactive proofs? Information Processing Letters 25, 127–132, 1987.
L. Babai, S. Moran. Arthur-Merlin games: A randomized proof system, and a hierarchy of complexity classes. Journal of Computer and System Science 36 2, 254–276, 1988.
J. Cai, A. Condon, R. Lipton. PSPACE is provable by two provers in one round. Manuscript, 1990.
L. Fortnow, J. Rompel, M. Sipser. On the power of multi-prover interactive protocols. 3rd Structure in Complexity Theory (IEEE), 156–161, 1988.
L. Fortnow, J. Rompel, M. Sipser. Errata for on the power of multi-prover interactive protocols. 5th Structure in Complexity Theory (IEEE), 318–319, 1990.
L. Fortnow, M. Sipser. Are there interactive protocols for co-NP languages? Information Processing Letters 28, 249–251, 1988.
S. Goldwasser, S. Micali, C. Rackoff. The knowledge complexity of interactive proof systems. 17th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), 291–304, 1985.
S. Goldwasser, M. Sipser. Private coins versus public coins in interactive proof systems. 18th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), 59–68, 1986.
C. Lund, L. Fortnow, H. Karloff, N. Nisan. The polynomial time hierarchy has interactive proofs. E-mail announcement, 1989.
U. Schöning. Complexity and Structure. Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science 211, 1986.
A. Shamir. IP = PSPACE. E-mail announcement, 1989, also in 31st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 11–15, 1990.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Hertrampf, U., Wagner, K. (1991). Interactive proof systems: Provers, rounds, and error bounds. In: Börger, E., Kleine Büning, H., Richter, M.M., Schönfeld, W. (eds) Computer Science Logic. CSL 1990. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 533. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-54487-9_63
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-54487-9_63
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-54487-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-38401-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive