Abstract
This paper describes a novel approach to planning. The presented algorithm is based on a consistency maintaining procedure for computing possible worlds out of given worlds and applications of operators. Worlds are represented by facts, rules, and consistency constraints. In order to avoid the frame and qualification problems we state neither frame axioms nor qualification axioms. Instead, general consistency constraints are used. As a result an execution of an action which asserts its postconditions to the current state of the world may result in inconsistency. A repair mechanism then generates possible changes (repairs) to the inconsistent world such that the resulting world describes the actual consistent state of affairs, i. e. a possible world after the execution of an action.
The generated repairs serve two purposes: as they describe possible worlds in which the action's postconditions hold, they can be used to reason about these worlds and eliminate those which have undesired properties. Moreover, the repairs are used to guide the linear planner such that the generated plans lead to the selected possible world.
Part of the research was performed while the author was visiting the Dept. of AI, University of Edinburgh, Scotland. This visit was supported by the Commission of European Communities under grant ERBSCI*CT000301 — (SC1000301).
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
M. Decker. Entwurf und Implementierung eines Planers basierend auf einem Konsistenzerhaltungsmechanismus einer deduktiven Datenbank. Diplomarbeit, 1991.
J. Dix, J. Posegga, and P.H. Schmitt. Modal Logic for AI Planning. In First Intern. Conf. on Expert Planning Systems, Brighton, UK, July 1990. IEE.
R. Fikes and N. Nilsson. STRIPS: A new approach to theorem proving in problem solving. Artificial Intelligence, 2:189 ff., 1971.
M. L. Ginsberg and D. E. Smith. Possible worlds planning I + II. Artificial Intelligence, 35, 1988.
C. Green. Application of theorem proving to problem solving. In Proc. 1st IJCAI, Washington D.C., 1969.
R. Kowalski. Logic for problem solving. DCL TechReport 75, DAI, Edinburgh, Scotland, 1974.
Vladimir Lifschitz. On the semantics of STRIPS. In Michael P. Georgeff and Amy L. Lansky, editors, Reasoning about Actions and Plans, Proceedings of the 1986 Workshop, Los Altos, CA, 1987. Morgan Kaufmann.
John McCarthy and Pat Hayes. Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In B. Meltzer and D. Michie, editors, Machine Intelligence 4. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, Scotland, 1969.
G. Moerkotte. Inkonsistenzen in deduktiven Datenbanken (Inconsistencies in deductive databases). Informatik Fachberichte Nr. 248. Springer-Verlag, 1990.
G. Moerkotte and P.C. Lockemann. Reactive consistency control in deductive databases. tech. report 3/90, Universität Karlsruhe, 1989.
J.-M. Nicolas. Logic for improving integrity checking in relational data bases. Acta Informatica, 18, 1982. 227–253.
R. Reiter. On closed world data bases. In: H. Gallaire And J. Minker (Eds.), Logic And Data Bases, Plenum, New York, 1978. 227–253.
Marianne Winslett. Theory Revision Semantics for Use in Reasoning about Actions. In Proc. AAAI-88, 1988.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Decker, M., Moerkotte, G., Müller, H., Posegga, J. (1991). Consistency driven planning. In: Barahona, P., Moniz Pereira, L., Porto, A. (eds) EPIA 91. EPIA 1991. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 541. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-54535-2_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-54535-2_34
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-54535-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-38459-5
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive